• Home
  • Coraid EtherDrive vs. IBM SAN32B-E4

Coraid EtherDrive vs IBM SAN32B-E4 comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Coraid Logo

    Coraid EtherDrive

    views| comparisons
    IBM Logo

    IBM SAN32B-E4

    23 views|17 comparisons
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    11th
    out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
    Views
    23
    Comparisons
    17
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SRX, VSX, ZX
    SAN32B-E4
    Learn More
    Coraid
    Video Not Available
    IBM
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    The IBM System Storage SAN32B-E4 is designed to deliver fabric-based encryption services, providing up to 96 Gbps of encryption processing for disk and 48 Gbps of compression and encryption processing for tape.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A., L'Or_al S.A., Vaasan Oy, IBM Systems and Technology Group, Odin

    Coraid EtherDrive doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while IBM SAN32B-E4 is ranked 11th in Enterprise SAN. Coraid EtherDrive is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN32B-E4 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Coraid EtherDrive is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN32B-E4 is most compared with .

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.