• Home
  • Coraid EtherDrive vs. IBM SAN384B

Coraid EtherDrive vs IBM SAN384B comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Coraid Logo

    Coraid EtherDrive

    views| comparisons
    IBM Logo

    IBM SAN384B

    234 views|191 comparisons
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    5th
    out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
    Views
    234
    Comparisons
    191
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SRX, VSX, ZX
    SAN384B
    Learn More
    Coraid
    Video Not Available
    IBM
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    The IBM System Storage SAN384B fabric backbone is a core and edge network switching platform designed for midrange to enterprise-level Storage Area Network (SAN) applications. It features multiprotocol architecture, high performance, and scalable design:
    • 8 Gbps industry-standard Fibre Channel (FC) switch capability for systems that support 8 Gbps throughput
    • Auto sensing FC ports supporting 1 Gbps, 2 Gbps, 4 Gbps, and 8 Gbps
    • Up to 384, 8 Gbps user ports connected in a dual core with the use of Inter-Chassis Links (ICLs), and up to 192 ports in a single domain
    • High-performance port and switching blades
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Tabicel, Sanmarco Informatica, National Institutes of Health, Chapman University, Baldor Electric, University of New Brunswick, Harim Group Corp.

    Coraid EtherDrive doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while IBM SAN384B is ranked 5th in Enterprise SAN. Coraid EtherDrive is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN384B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Coraid EtherDrive is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN384B is most compared with IBM SAN48B-5 and Cisco MDS Series.

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.