• Home
  • Coraid EtherDrive vs. IBM SAN40B-4

Coraid EtherDrive vs IBM SAN40B-4 comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Coraid Logo

    Coraid EtherDrive

    views| comparisons
    IBM Logo

    IBM SAN40B-4

    22 views|9 comparisons
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    13th
    out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
    Views
    22
    Comparisons
    9
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SRX, VSX, ZX
    SAN40B-4
    Learn More
    Coraid
    Video Not Available
    IBM
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    The IBM System Storage SAN40B-4 SAN fabric switch provides 24, 32 or 40 active ports and is designed for high performance with 8 Gbps link speeds and backward compatibility to support links running at 4, 2 and 1 Gbps link speeds. High availability features make it suitable for use as a core switch in midrange environments or as an edge-switch in enterprise environments where a wide range of storage area network (SAN) infrastructure simplification and business continuity configurations are possible.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Cosan, EF Education First, Intesa Sanpaolo Assicura S.p.A., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, American National Bank

    Coraid EtherDrive doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while IBM SAN40B-4 is ranked 13th in Enterprise SAN. Coraid EtherDrive is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN40B-4 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Coraid EtherDrive is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN40B-4 is most compared with .

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.