Corelight vs IronNet Collective Defense Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Corelight Logo
3,270 views|1,630 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IronNet Logo
763 views|238 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Corelight and IronNet Collective Defense Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle.""It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment.""Corelight is easy to use.""It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks.""The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."

More Corelight Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use and the full reach of services."

More IronNet Collective Defense Platform Pros →

Cons
"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful.""Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly.""Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time.""They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access.""The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."

More Corelight Cons →

"I would like to see it integrate with third-party systems."

More IronNet Collective Defense Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's a yearly fee and depends on what you are looking for."
  • More Corelight Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the eventual forwarding of events and parsed data logs to a security team’s SIEM or… more »
    Top Answer:It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks.
    Top Answer:The solution is too expensive compared to others. If you have the technical knowledge, it's good. Corelight is a very big gap between you and others if you’re new.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,270
    Comparisons
    1,630
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    763
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IronDefense, Iron Dome, Cyber Operations Center
    Learn More
    Overview

    Corelight is the most powerful network visibility solution for information security professionals. We provide real-time data that organizations use to understand, detect, and prevent cyber attacks. Our solution is built on Zeek, the powerful and widely-used open source monitoring framework.

    When organizations collaborate to detect, share intelligence, and stop threats together in real time, they form a Collective Defense community. Discover how IronNet's Collective Defense platform – built on our IronDome and IronDefense products – enables organizations to realize the full benefits of this approach.

    The IronNet Collective Defense Platform leverages advanced AI-driven Network Detection and Response (NDR) capabilities to detect and prioritize anomalous activity inside individual enterprise network environments. The platform analyzes threat detections across the community to identify broad attack patterns and provides anonymized intelligence back to all community members in real time, giving all members early insight into potential incoming attacks. See Collective Defense in action.

    Sample Customers
    Education First
    Thomson Reuters
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    Construction Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Corelight is ranked 7th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 5 reviews while IronNet Collective Defense Platform is ranked 14th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Corelight is rated 9.0, while IronNet Collective Defense Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Corelight writes "An open-source solution that gave us insight into our clients' network traffic flow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IronNet Collective Defense Platform writes "Easy to use, stable, and easy to install". Corelight is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Darktrace, Vectra AI, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Arista NDR, whereas IronNet Collective Defense Platform is most compared with Darktrace and ExtraHop Reveal(x).

    See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.

    We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.