Compare CoreOS Clair vs. NGINX App Protect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CoreOS Clair Logo
585 views|515 comparisons
NGINX App Protect Logo
3,022 views|2,486 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Snyk, Mirantis and others in Container Security. Updated: July 2021.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative.""Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."

More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall.
Top Answer: Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year. We pay on an annual basis. We just have our operating costs on top of that.
Top Answer: The solution does well when there's low throughput but when we go for any high throughput, it's always a challenge. I'm expecting the next version to have a better high throughput. I also find that… more »
Ranking
15th
out of 24 in Container Security
Views
585
Comparisons
515
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 24 in Container Security
Views
3,022
Comparisons
2,486
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
584
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
Learn More
Overview

Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in appc and docker containers.

Vulnerability data is continuously imported from a known set of sources and correlated with the indexed contents of container images in order to produce lists of vulnerabilities that threaten a container. When vulnerability data changes upstream, the previous state and new state of the vulnerability along with the images they affect can be sent via webhook to a configured endpoint. All major components can be customized programmatically at compile-time without forking the project.

Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.

Offer
Learn more about CoreOS Clair
Learn more about NGINX App Protect
Sample Customers
eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce
m.a.x IT
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Manufacturing Company11%
Retailer11%
Media Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider28%
Media Company6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Snyk, Mirantis and others in Container Security. Updated: July 2021.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CoreOS Clair is ranked 15th in Container Security while NGINX App Protect is ranked 6th in Container Security with 3 reviews. CoreOS Clair is rated 0.0, while NGINX App Protect is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". CoreOS Clair is most compared with Snyk, Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Tenable.io Container Security and Sysdig Secure, whereas NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Front Door and Fortinet FortiWeb.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.