CoreOS Rocket vs Spoonium comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
97 views|65 comparisons
Spoon Logo
views| comparisons
Ranking
Views
97
Comparisons
65
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Container Virtualization
Comparisons
Learn More
Spoon
Video Not Available
Overview
Rocket is an application container engine developed for modern production cloud-native environments. It features a pod-native approach, a pluggable execution environment, and a well-defined surface area that makes it ideal for integration with other systems. The core execution unit of rkt is the pod, a collection of one or more applications executing in a shared context (Rocket's pods are synonymous with the concept in the Kubernetes orchestration system). Rocket allows users to apply different configurations (like isolation parameters) at both pod-level and at the more granular per-application level. Rocket's architecture means that each pod executes directly in the classic Unix process model (i.e. there is no central daemon), in a self-contained, isolated environment. rkt implements a modern, open, standard container format, the App Container (appc) spec, but can also execute other container images, like those created with Docker.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Atlassian, MemSQL, Deis, Rackspace, Cloud Foundry
Novell, LANDESK Software

CoreOS Rocket is ranked 3rd in Container Virtualization while Spoonium doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Container Virtualization. CoreOS Rocket is rated 0.0, while Spoonium is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CoreOS Rocket is most compared with Canonical LXD, whereas Spoonium is most compared with .

We monitor all Container Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.