Compare Correlsense SharePath vs. Elastic APM

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Correlsense SharePath Logo
127 views|88 comparisons
Elastic APM Logo
3,403 views|2,669 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: July 2021.
523,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
523,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical.
Top Answer: The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. That's a big portion of it. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is… more »
Top Answer: We use it for monitoring the application performance and development.
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Learn More
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.

Elastic APM is an application performance monitoring system built on the Elastic Stack. It allows you to monitor software services and applications in real time — collect detailed performance information on response time for incoming requests, database queries, calls to caches, external HTTP requests, and more. This makes it easy to pinpoint and fix performance problems quickly.

Elastic APM also automatically collects unhandled errors and exceptions. Errors are grouped based primarily on the stacktrace, so you can identify new errors as they appear and keep an eye on how many times specific errors happen.

Learn more about Correlsense SharePath
Learn more about Elastic APM
Sample Customers
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: July 2021.
523,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Correlsense SharePath is ranked 67th in Application Performance Management (APM) while Elastic APM is ranked 15th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. Correlsense SharePath is rated 0.0, while Elastic APM is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic APM writes "The best full stack observability compared to any other tool". Correlsense SharePath is most compared with Dynatrace, whereas Elastic APM is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic Browser, Datadog, AppDynamics and AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.