• Home
  • Correlsense SharePath vs. Mackerel

Correlsense SharePath vs Mackerel comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Correlsense Logo

Correlsense SharePath

Read 1 Correlsense SharePath review
139 views|108 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Mackerel Logo

Mackerel

161 views|137 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Correlsense SharePath and Mackerel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications.
* It provides customer insight and behaviour. * It's improved our alerting, monitoring and reporting. * It proactively identifies problems.
Use Mackerel?
Ranking
84th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
139
Comparisons
108
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
75th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
161
Comparisons
137
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePath
Learn More
Correlsense
Mackerel
Video Not Available
Overview
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
Mackerel is an elegantly simple and powerful service that employs the concept of "roles" to optimize management and monitoring of hosts. By running mackerel-agent on your hosts, you can manage any number of hosts using both Mackerel's web GUI and API to visualize the statuses of your hosts and applications with a high degree of detail and customization.
Sample Customers
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
M.T.Burn Inc., Nulab Inc., Nintendo, Livesense, Seesaa, Retty, Gyazo, Hatena, GMO, Kaizen Platform, Prott
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Correlsense SharePath is ranked 84th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Mackerel is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0, while Mackerel is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". On the other hand, Correlsense SharePath is most compared with , whereas Mackerel is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.