Compare Correlsense SharePath vs. Mackerel

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Correlsense SharePath Logo
127 views|88 comparisons
Mackerel Logo
181 views|147 comparisons
Ranking
Views
127
Comparisons
88
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
181
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: June 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePath
Learn More
Mackerel
Video Not Available
Overview
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
Mackerel is an elegantly simple and powerful service that employs the concept of "roles" to optimize management and monitoring of hosts. By running mackerel-agent on your hosts, you can manage any number of hosts using both Mackerel's web GUI and API to visualize the statuses of your hosts and applications with a high degree of detail and customization.
Offer
Learn more about Correlsense SharePath
Learn more about Mackerel
Sample Customers
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
M.T.Burn Inc., Nulab Inc., Nintendo, Livesense, Seesaa, Retty, Gyazo, Hatena, GMO, Kaizen Platform, Prott
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: June 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Correlsense SharePath is ranked 67th in Application Performance Management (APM) while Mackerel is ranked 59th in Application Performance Management (APM). Correlsense SharePath is rated 0.0, while Mackerel is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Correlsense SharePath is most compared with Dynatrace, whereas Mackerel is most compared with Datadog.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.