Correlsense SharePath vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Correlsense SharePath and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
142
Comparisons
110
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
597
Comparisons
404
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
374
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePath
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
Learn More
Overview
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
Sample Customers
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
BSkyB, Alior Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company10%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Correlsense SharePath is ranked 82nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". Correlsense SharePath is most compared with , whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Accedian Skylight and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.