Compare Correlsense SharePath vs. New Relic Browser

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that.""This is an expensive product."

More New Relic Browser Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
131
Comparisons
91
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,412
Comparisons
1,284
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
340
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePath
Learn More
Overview
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
New Relic Browser provides deep visibility and actionable insights into real users' experiences on your website. With standard page load timing (sometimes referred to as real user monitoring or RUM), New Relic measures the overall time to load the entire webpage. However, New Relic Browser goes beyond RUM to also help you monitor the performance of individual sessions, AJAX requests, and JavaScript errors extending the monitoring throughout the entire life cycle of the page.
Offer
Learn more about Correlsense SharePath
Learn more about New Relic Browser
Sample Customers
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Fairfax Media, Despergar.com, MercadoLibre, Veracode, Costa Coffee, Kiva, Alkami, Mondia Media, Bringmeister.de, Simplesurance, Confused.com, ReachLocal, Lending Club, Boozt.com, Trainline
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company9%
Wholesaler/Distributor5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Correlsense SharePath is ranked 67th in Application Performance Management (APM) while New Relic Browser is ranked 38th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Correlsense SharePath is rated 0.0, while New Relic Browser is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic Browser writes "Stable and scalable but does not provide input regarding page performance". Correlsense SharePath is most compared with Dynatrace, whereas New Relic Browser is most compared with Elastic APM, New Relic APM, Datadog, Akamai mPulse and IBM Application Performance Management.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.