We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that."
"This is an expensive product."
Correlsense SharePath is ranked 67th in Application Performance Management (APM) while New Relic Browser is ranked 38th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Correlsense SharePath is rated 0.0, while New Relic Browser is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic Browser writes "Stable and scalable but does not provide input regarding page performance". Correlsense SharePath is most compared with Dynatrace, whereas New Relic Browser is most compared with Elastic APM, New Relic APM, Datadog, Akamai mPulse and IBM Application Performance Management.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.