• Home
  • Correlsense SharePath vs. Ruxit [EOL]

Correlsense SharePath vs Ruxit [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Correlsense Logo

Correlsense SharePath

Read 1 Correlsense SharePath review
139 views|108 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Dynatrace Logo

Ruxit [EOL]

Read 4 Ruxit [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Correlsense SharePath and Ruxit [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications.
* It provides customer insight and behaviour. * It's improved our alerting, monitoring and reporting. * It proactively identifies problems.
Mark Kaplan
Best overall monitoring system out there
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. ...
Top Answer:Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with… more »
Read all 72 answers   →
Ranking
84th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
139
Comparisons
108
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePath
Learn More
Correlsense
Dynatrace
Video Not Available
Overview
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.

ruxit provides all-in-one monitoring and operations management for DevOps teams working in startups, mid-sized companies, and large organizations. Using proprietary artificial intelligence technology, ruxit enables companies to manage thousands of servers using a simple interface.

ruxit includes monitoring features that cover your entire application stack:
• Real user monitoring (browser-based performance monitoring)
• Application performance monitoring for Java, Node.js, and .NET (PHP and Ruby coming soon)
• Server and process monitoring for Windows and Linux
• Network monitoring
• EC2 virtual infrastructure monitoring

Sample Customers
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Sofico, lemniscus.de, CHIP Digital, BARBRI INC, Bluesoft, uninett.no, Usersnap
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Correlsense SharePath is ranked 84th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Ruxit [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0, while Ruxit [EOL] is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruxit [EOL] writes "Best overall monitoring system out there". Correlsense SharePath is most compared with , whereas Ruxit [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.