Compare Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Total Defense Anti-Virus

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Use Total Defense Anti-Virus? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Broadcom, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I feel it is fairly priced.""The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.""We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice.""It is "expensive" and flexible.""Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance.""I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require.""It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses.""The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks TrapsCA Threat Manager Total Defense
Learn
Cisco
Palo Alto Networks
Total Defense
Video Not Available
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the world's first detection and response app that natively integrates network, endpoint and cloud data to stop sophisticated attacks. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks accurately detects threats with behavioral analytics and reveals the root cause to speed up investigations.

Total Defense Anti-Virus provides a real-time protection for your PCs that detects and removes any threat, without negative impact on your speed and performance. It prevents your Windows desktops and laptops from being infected by viruses, malware, ransomware, and spyware. It offers free upgrades and automatically updates security multiple times a day so you're always protected from the latest online threats.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Learn more about Total Defense Anti-Virus
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankCBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBankAmazon, P. C. Richard & Son, Electronic Express, Aaron's, Conn's
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company23%
Government5%
Manufacturing Company3%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Mining And Metals Company14%
Retailer7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider21%
Media Company5%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider14%
Retailer11%
Media Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise46%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Broadcom, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business. Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 20 reviews while Total Defense Anti-Virus is ranked 15th in Anti-Malware Tools. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Total Defense Anti-Virus is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks writes "Its multi-layer approach helps my organization with anti-malware, exploit protection, and restrictions". On the other hand, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender Antivirus and Carbon Black CB Defense, whereas Total Defense Anti-Virus is most compared with Microsoft Defender Antivirus, Avecto Defendpoint, Norton Security Premium, Malwarebytes and Carbon Black CB Defense.

See our list of .

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.