We performed a comparison between Couchbase and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."It can scale horizontally, and we are looking to expand our capacity."
"It is pretty stable."
"I can input any kind of document into the solution and it is integrated using a dynamic API. This has been the most valuable aspect of using this solution."
"I have found the views to be very valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Couchbase is document indexing. It is better than MongoDB. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views."
"The most valuable features are the ease of application and the merging of data."
"The valuable features of Couchbase are the many documents and index types, and they made a lot of features available enabling us to use it as a complete solution for our needs."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"The tool performs well."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"One thing that could improved upon is the level of concurrency. The documentation for this solution could also be improved."
"The scripting language for this solution could be improved. A big selling point is that they're like SQL server but there is still quite a lot of missing functionality."
"It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version."
"It's easy to deploy. Where the challenge comes in is when you start putting data in, doing the indexes, and doing the integration with systems. Integration is one of their weakest points. Natively, there should be a wide range of integration options to be able to get data in."
"I have tried multiple libraries in a demo they provide and it works fine, but when it merges with libraries, it creates a problem."
"Couchbase could improve the design of the UI because it should be optimized for viewing statistics or a similar feature."
"There are some limitations to the database. The SQL database cannot handle real-time processing for critical IoT scenarios. What we have to do is store our data into the database then code it out, this wastes a lot of time."
"Needs some capacity planning to deal with too much memory, CPUs and displays."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The installation is difficult."
Couchbase is ranked 2nd in NoSQL Databases with 10 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Couchbase is rated 8.2, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Couchbase writes "No SQL cloud based solution used to manage unstructured data and push out large volumes of metrics at a low latency". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Couchbase is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, CouchDB and Apache HBase, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
