We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Couchbase vs. Scylla

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Couchbase Logo
1,951 views|1,267 comparisons
Scylla Logo
1,199 views|988 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."

More Couchbase Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I have found the views to be very valuable.
Top Answer: Most of the time, the only issued that I have faced was when we upgraded the Couchbase version. It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version. The only problem with… more »
Top Answer: We are solution providers and we are vendors. We provide products to our clients. I am working on Couchbase and Elasticsearch together. We use Couchbase as a family data engine for immigration… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
5th
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
1,951
Comparisons
1,267
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
447
Rating
9.0
9th
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
1,199
Comparisons
988
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Couchbase Server is a NoSQL database, which has become the de facto standard for building Systems of Engagement. It is designed with a distributed architecture for performance, scalability, and availability. It enables developers to build applications easier and faster by leveraging the power of SQL with the flexibility of JSON.

The new string, date, array, and JSON object functions that have been added to N1QL simplify data transformations and provide richer query expressions.

Faster queries in N1QL are the result of several query engine performance enhancements across many types of operations, including joins and index scans.

The most innovative enterprises are introducing NoSQL to replace or augment legacy databases, including Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server. With Couchbase Server, they get the best of both worlds – the powerful querying and enterprise features of a relational database, combined with the scalability, performance, and flexibility of a NoSQL database.

To make the transition easier, Couchbase Server provides many of the same features found in relational databases.



Scylla is an open source drop-in replacement for Apache Cassandra with scale-up performance of 1,000,000 IOPS per node, scale-out to hundreds of nodes and 99% latency of < 1msec.  Available as a managed service (Scylla Cloud), on popular cloud providers or on-prem

Offer
Learn more about Couchbase
Learn more about Scylla
Sample Customers
LinkedIn, Marriott, PayPal
IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider25%
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm13%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company21%
Media Company10%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Cloudera, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: October 2021.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Couchbase is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews while Scylla is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases. Couchbase is rated 9.0, while Scylla is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Couchbase writes "Good interface, dashboard, and analytics, and I have never needed anything else with it". On the other hand, Couchbase is most compared with Cassandra, MongoDB, Apache HBase, CouchDB and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Scylla is most compared with MongoDB, Aerospike Database, Apache HBase, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Cassandra.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.