Couchbase vs SingleStore comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Couchbase Logo
4,272 views|2,883 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SingleStore Logo
308 views|238 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Couchbase and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are the ease of application and the merging of data.""The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views.""I can input any kind of document into the solution and it is integrated using a dynamic API. This has been the most valuable aspect of using this solution.""The principal advantage of Couchbase is that we can have multiple database paradigms in the same product, without deploying multiple databases. We also like that it has lower latency, when compared to its competitor: Cassandra.""I have found the views to be very valuable.""The most valuable feature of Couchbase is document indexing. It is better than MongoDB. Additionally, the solution is easy to use.""It can scale horizontally, and we are looking to expand our capacity.""The main advantages were associated with it being a no SQL database. It helped us send out metrics or rewards to multiple players in our game at a very low latency."

More Couchbase Pros →

"It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data.""The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown.""The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms.""The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines.""The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.""MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."

More SingleStore Pros →

Cons
"The scripting language for this solution could be improved. A big selling point is that they're like SQL server but there is still quite a lot of missing functionality.""It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version.""One thing that could improved upon is the level of concurrency. The documentation for this solution could also be improved.""The failover and failback could be a bit easier. When I looked at it last time, it had to be manually done. It also took over an hour for us to rebalance all the nodes.""Needs some capacity planning to deal with too much memory, CPUs and displays.""The performance could be quicker and better, especially in the querying process.""It's easy to deploy. Where the challenge comes in is when you start putting data in, doing the indexes, and doing the integration with systems. Integration is one of their weakest points. Natively, there should be a wide range of integration options to be able to get data in.""We would like to have a better management of Kubernetes with the free, open source version of Couchbase. We don't have any major complaints other than that."

More Couchbase Cons →

"There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great.""Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial.""It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks.""For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback.""We don't get good discounts in Pakistan.""Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally.""The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings."

More SingleStore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."
  • "We estimate that it's not very expensive, however, the pricing that you can get from the account managers, e.g. the public pricing, could be a bit expensive."
  • "I wouldn't say Couchbase offers good value for money."
  • "It seems very reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than Redis, but we've got an enterprise license. So, it's about normal. It's not outrageous in price as far as we've seen. From Couchbase, there's no additional fee as far as I'm aware, but when you're integrating, there's an additional fee because a lot of times, they don't have an integration stack."
  • "I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."
  • More Couchbase Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."
  • "SingleStore is a bit expensive."
  • "The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."
  • "Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."
  • "The price of the product is okay compared to the other available solutions in the market. SingleStore is a reasonably priced product, considering the functions it offers."
  • "They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."
  • More SingleStore Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views.
    Top Answer:Their security model leaves something to be desired. Their indexes could use some work, but once we found out what was going on with them, it became second. So, the biggest one so far is integrating… more »
    Top Answer:We're in the middle of building out a persistent cache layer using Couchbase. That's across multiple international regions, but we have other instances where we're using it for data stores and some… more »
    Top Answer:The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.
    Top Answer:Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM… more »
    Top Answer:There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    4,272
    Comparisons
    2,883
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    896
    Rating
    7.8
    6th
    Views
    308
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 48% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 27% of the time.
    ScyllaDB logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    CouchDB logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Aerospike Database 7 logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Teradata logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Learn More
    SingleStore
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Couchbase is a versatile database solution for healthcare, automation, e-commerce, gaming, caching, and analytics. It supports 920 nodes and 420 clusters, making it scalable and extensible. Its valuable features include multiple database paradigms, low latency, dynamic API integration, Sync Gateway for mobile apps, and a user-friendly interface. 

    Couchbase has helped organizations with low latency metrics, large user updates, and cost-effective caching. Its built-in data replication and disaster recovery features make it a complete solution for various needs.

    SingleStore is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and offers the SingleStore platform,which combines transactional, analytical, & vector data workloads in a real-time, unified, distributed SQL database that is MySQL and MongoDB wire protocol-compatible. SingleStoreDB Cloud is offered as a managed service on AWS, Google, and Azure and in private clouds including IBM Cloud Pak for Data and Red Hat OpenShift. Other partners (50+ in all) include HPE, Twingo, Data-Sleek, Datadog, and Arcion. SingleStoreDB Self-Managed runs on premise/containers/Kubernetes. SingleStore has offices in Sunnyvale, Seattle, Portland, Raleigh, Boston, London, Dublin, Lisbon, Kyiv, Hyderabad, and Singapore, with remote workers worldwide. It has hundreds of customers including 100+ Fortune 500, Forbes Global 2000, and Inc. 5000 brands across 37 verticals, with the top four being financial services and fintech; media, streaming, and telecommunications; adtech/martech/salestech; and retail/eCommerce. SingleStore platform features include Code Engine with WASM, Data API, dbt Connector, Limitless Point-in-Time Recovery, MongoDB API, Pipelines, Unlimited (Bottomless) Storage, and Workspaces.

    Sample Customers
    Amadeus, Cisco, Comcast, LinkedIn, GE
    SingleStore has hundreds of customers including 100+ Fortune 500, Forbes Global 2000, and Inc. 5000 brands across 37 verticals, with the top four being financial services and fintech; media, streaming, and telecommunications; adtech/martech/salestech; and retail/eCommerce. Sample customers include: 6Sense Adobe Akamai CARFAX Cigna Cisco Comcast DBS Bank Dell GE Goldman Sachs Heap Hulu IMAX Kakao Kroger LiveRamp Lumana NBC Outreach Palo Alto Networks Siemens SiriusXM SK Telecom SKAI Sony STC TATA ZoomInfo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Couchbase is ranked 2nd in NoSQL Databases with 10 reviews while SingleStore is ranked 6th in Database as a Service with 7 reviews. Couchbase is rated 8.2, while SingleStore is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Couchbase writes "No SQL cloud based solution used to manage unstructured data and push out large volumes of metrics at a low latency". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support". Couchbase is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, CouchDB and Aerospike Database 7, whereas SingleStore is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata, Oracle Database and CockroachDB.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.