![]() | Anonymous User IT Manager at a insurance company |
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB."
"It is rather expensive."
"MongoDB is an open-source solution."
"This is an open-source solution."
"We use the open-source version, which is available to use free of charge."
"I don't know, but I have heard from people who procure it that it is much cheaper than Oracle."
"MongoDB is not expensive."
"At the moment, all customers are using the community version."
Earn 20 points
CouchDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 23 reviews. CouchDB is rated 0.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Good security, highly-available when installed in a cluster, and no schema is needed to store data". CouchDB is most compared with Apache HBase, Cassandra, Couchbase and Scylla, whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Scylla, Couchbase, Neo4j and SingleStore DB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.