Compare CouchDB vs. MongoDB

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CouchDB Logo
869 views|773 comparisons
MongoDB Logo
4,096 views|3,271 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Cloudera, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: March 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB.""It is rather expensive.""MongoDB is an open-source solution.""This is an open-source solution.""We use the open-source version, which is available to use free of charge.""I don't know, but I have heard from people who procure it that it is much cheaper than Oracle.""MongoDB is not expensive.""At the moment, all customers are using the community version."

More MongoDB Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: SQreamDB is a GPU DB. It is not suitable for real-time oltp of course. Cassandra is best suited for OLTP database use cases, when you need a scalable database (instead of SQL server, Postgres)… more »
Top Answer: It is very easy to create a MongoDB cluster. You can deploy three nodes in one hour. You can do small configurations to enable routing. It is easy to implement.
Top Answer: At the moment, all customers are using the community version.
Ranking
11th
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
869
Comparisons
773
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
4,096
Comparisons
3,271
Reviews
22
Average Words per Review
497
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Learn More
Overview
Apache CouchDB is open source database software that focuses on ease of use and having a scalable architecture. It has a document-oriented NoSQL database architecture and is implemented in the concurrency-oriented language Erlang; it uses JSON to store data, JavaScript as its query language using MapReduce, and HTTP for an API.
Open source database alternative to relational databases. It simplifies development and is extremely scalable.
Offer
Learn more about CouchDB
Learn more about MongoDB
Sample Customers
Verizon, Dimagi Inc., Apple, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Perspecta
Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Legal Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Outsourcing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company21%
Government7%
Educational Organization6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise56%
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Cloudera, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: March 2021.
473,673 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CouchDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 23 reviews. CouchDB is rated 0.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Good security, highly-available when installed in a cluster, and no schema is needed to store data". CouchDB is most compared with Apache HBase, Cassandra, Couchbase and Scylla, whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Scylla, Couchbase, Neo4j and SingleStore DB.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.