• Home
  • Coverity vs. Portshift

Coverity vs Portshift comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Synopsys Logo

Coverity

Read 33 Coverity reviews
17,993 views|11,623 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo

Portshift

37 views|11 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Coverity and Portshift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Estefania Ramirez
Great app analysis, support, and pricing
The product allows us to find vulnerabilities while testing our apps.
Use Portshift?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Coverity is quite expensive."
  • "The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."
  • "The price is competitive with other solutions."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "Coverity is very expensive."
  • "This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."
  • "The pricing is very reasonable compared to other platforms. It is based on a three year license."
  • "The pricing is on the expensive side, and we are paying for a couple of items."

    • More Coverity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
    Top Answer:We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing… more »
    What do you like most about Coverity?
    Top Answer:The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?
    Top Answer:The tool was fairly priced.
    Read all 20 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    17,993
    Comparisons
    11,623
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    8.0
    63rd
    out of 74 in Application Security Tools
    Views
    37
    Comparisons
    11
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Synopsys Static Analysis
    Learn More
    Synopsys
    Cisco
    Overview

    Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts. 

    Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports 22 languages and over 70 frameworks and templates.

    The acquisition of Portshift represents Cisco’s focus on the next wave of innovation by anticipating, investing in and incubating new technologies that we can scale and take to market. Through Cisco’s Emerging Technologies and Incubation (ET&I) group, Cisco incubates and advances new and emerging technologies that address Cisco’s customers’ most challenging enterprise IT issues. Application Security is one of the initial focus areas of ET&I.

    Sample Customers
    MStar Semiconductor, Alcatel-Lucent
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company39%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government4%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Coverity is ranked 4th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 33 reviews while Portshift is ranked 63rd in Application Security Tools. Coverity is rated 7.8, while Portshift is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Coverity writes "Best SAST tool to check software quality issues". On the other hand, Coverity is most compared with SonarQube, Klocwork, Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx One and Veracode, whereas Portshift is most compared with .

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.