Compare ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. cPacket cClear

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: June 2021.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Compared to other products, Auvik's pricing is more feasible since you get all its features. You pay for licenses on a per network device basis. It monitors hypervisors, but does not bill for that. There are no additional costs, which is something that I like.""The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device.""Its pricing is a little on the high end. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. It is more expensive than other solutions, but their per-device model is very fair. Anything other than the networking gear is monitored by Auvik at no charge.""The value is there. It's not that expensive per device and it's licensed per device. Unlike some of the other tools that I use, it's not real expensive. It's a good value for the price.""It's great for small businesses, but when you start reviewing the pricing model, depending on how many devices, and what sub-devices you decide to pull in, it can get tricky as far as the pricing goes.""As an individual IP company, Auvik is a little bit pricey. It is a little expensive, but as an MSP owner, I have a small side business. So, I'm an Auvik customer in that sense too. In that, I think it's reasonable to pay $10 to $15 a device or less depending on the endpoint. For the amount of capability that it has, it is very reasonably priced."

More Auvik Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: One of the best things about Auvik, and it's why it's one of my go-to products, are the remote access capabilities… more »
Top Answer: The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per… more »
Top Answer: The logging features could be a little bit better polished, although that aspect is relatively new. It comes in as raw… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts.
Top Answer: The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years. However, we were… more »
Top Answer: We've had some struggles getting it to see everything that we want to see. Network visibility is something that needs to… more »
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Auvik is cloud-based software that simplifies and automates network monitoring and management to give you complete network visibility and control.

Designed to deploy in minutes, you’ll resolve problems faster than ever with real-time network mapping and inventory, powerful troubleshooting features, deep network traffic insights, automated config backups and restore, and more. https://www.auvik.com/get-free-trial

cPacket’s cClear is the visualization layer within your Intelligent Monitoring Fabric. It provides high-level views of every critical link, while allowing you instant access to the complete packet-level view of your data. It combines detailed performance monitoring, proactive alerts, and the ability to search across L2-L7 in real time and forensically. This allows you to quickly and proactively identify specific traffic profiles according to any combination of header fields, and patterns in the payload content.

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

Offer
Learn more about Auvik
Learn more about cPacket cClear
Learn more about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Vodafone
Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise29%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: June 2021.
510,534 professionals have used our research since 2012.

cPacket cClear is ranked 86th in Network Monitoring Software while ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is ranked 44th in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review. cPacket cClear is rated 0.0, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations writes "Good security detection and alerts, but we've had challenges with network visibility". cPacket cClear is most compared with Azure Network Watcher, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is most compared with Cisco Stealthwatch, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, vRealize Network Insight, Dynatrace and Splunk.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.