Compare CrossBrowserTesting vs. Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing.""When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site.""I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team.""Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pros »

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR.""DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options.""The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

More Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Pros »

Cons
"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices.""The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default.""Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing."

More CrossBrowserTesting Cons »

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing.""The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans.""If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

More Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

More Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
534,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data.
Top Answer: SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together. If you find yourself utilizing other project management programs in addition to testing programs such as this, it is helpful to have programs… more »
Top Answer: Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing. This is one of the few concerns our team has had while trying… more »
Top Answer: DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use… more »
Top Answer: The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab… more »
Top Answer: The primary reason that we got Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is that we have a couple of systems that are run through virtual machines. Everybody who uses it in our company needs to go… more »
Ranking
15th
Views
3,392
Comparisons
1,974
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
456
Rating
9.3
12th
Views
8,991
Comparisons
4,804
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
1,653
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Eggplant DAI
Learn More
Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

  • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
  • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

A modern AI-assisted approach to test automation that helps you create products that delight users, deliver at DevOps speed, test the full customer experience, test ANY technology, and predict the quantified impact of new product versions on the user before release.

Offer
Learn more about CrossBrowserTesting
Learn more about Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence
Sample Customers
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
University11%
Healthcare Company11%
Media Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company7%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
Healthcare Company14%
Non Tech Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise47%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise63%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.2, while Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Live testing gives us the ability to identify potential issues on different browsers and devices proving to be a very useful tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence writes "Enables end-to-end testing, including smoke tests and several others". CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Tricentis Tosca, Sauce Labs, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is most compared with Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Micro Focus UFT One and froglogic Squish. See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.