CrossBrowserTesting vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
1,326 views|987 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,461 views|870 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and Oracle Application Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The screen shot portal is essential for an easy way to run tests across hundreds of browsers and retrieve screenshots which then indicate success or failure.""Record and Replay is the most used functionality for us, as we can record the test cases and play them on multiple combinations of platforms.""I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team.""I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.""When I started to work on testing automation, I was very excited about how easy it is to run tests on different browsers. It was just a matter of configuration.""Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data.""SmartBear has excellent, informative webinars, so keep an eye out for those.""Video recording of the script running in a cloud server."

More CrossBrowserTesting Pros →

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development.""We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users.""We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good.""The solution is scalable.""The function test feature is valuable.""Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications.""User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps.""OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros →

Cons
"The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default.""The speed connection in mobile devices could be improved, because sometimes the load time is uncertain.""It would be useful if we can run the live-testing test cases on multiple platforms at the same time, instead of waiting for one session to finish.""A wider range of physical devices with more browser versions in the Selenium Grid would be great to insure users with out-of-date devices are able to interact with our sites.""Elements of 'real' mobile/tablet testing could be sped up.""Sometimes the testing is slow.""Sometimes, some of their instances fail, particularly in older versions of browsers.""There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting."

More CrossBrowserTesting Cons →

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing.""The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly.""I have faced issues with some indexing items.""It needs to be compatible with all browsers.""I would like to see better dashboards.""Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac.""Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment.""The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."
  • "A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."
  • "CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."
  • "It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."
  • "SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."
  • More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."
  • "There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."
  • "Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."
  • "The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."
  • More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users.
    Top Answer:The speed of setup and deployment of this solution is based on the size and complexity of the organization implementing it. Depending on the size and complexity of the organization, this could take a… more »
    Top Answer:We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules. We would also like the customization of reports within the solution to… more »
    Ranking
    27th
    Views
    1,326
    Comparisons
    987
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    13th
    Views
    1,461
    Comparisons
    870
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    674
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OATS
    Learn More
    Overview

    CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

    • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
    • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.
    Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.
    Sample Customers
    St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
    Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools while Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 24 reviews. CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.0, while Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy". CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Bitbar, Tricentis Tosca, LambdaTest and Sauce Labs, whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.