Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs mabl comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Crosscheck Networks Logo
175 views|128 comparisons
mabl Logo
320 views|246 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar and mabl based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
36th
Views
175
Comparisons
128
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
33rd
Views
320
Comparisons
246
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAPSonar
Learn More
Crosscheck Networks
Video Not Available
Overview
Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar provides automated testing of each API independent of client, device or intended Consumer. Automatically generating a UI to provide immediate feedback to developers, testers, integrators, and security professionals. Validating each API independently shortens the critical path and supports concurrent Agile development. Fully automated, SOAPSonar requires no scripting or script maintenance, reducing time and skill level needed. Integration with variety test management software packages and providing detailed reports for progress tracking. Regression testing can be automated, providing early identification of changes to the API or versions. Support for message and protocol layer identity standards allows for cloud testing.

Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for Agile teams. It’s the only SaaS solution that tightly integrates automated end-to-end testing into the entire development lifecycle. With mabl creating, executing, and maintaining reliable tests has never been easier, allowing software teams to increase test coverage, speed up development and improve application quality.

Sample Customers
San Diego State University, Rumson Capital Advisor, Techlogix
Arch Insurance Group, Internet Travel Solutions, CareerBuilder, LOB, Building Engines, MaestroQA, TeamLeader, Piece of Cake
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company10%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools while mabl is ranked 33rd in Functional Testing Tools. Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is rated 0.0, while mabl is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is most compared with , whereas mabl is most compared with Functionize, Tricentis Tosca and Selenium HQ.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.