• Home
  • Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs. OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar and OpenText UFT Digital Lab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar?
Jacques Vermeulen
Robust solution for application lifecycle management with numerous valuable features
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."
  • "The product could be more affordable."
  • "While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

    • More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
    Top Answer:For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
    Top Answer:The desktop applications have performance issues since they don't work properly or don't detect objects properly, making it in an area where improvements are required. The product's object detection… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company to test desktop applications.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ranking
    36th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    175
    Comparisons
    128
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    20th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    778
    Comparisons
    531
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAPSonar
    Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center
    Learn More
    Crosscheck Networks
    Video Not Available
    OpenText
    Overview
    Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar provides automated testing of each API independent of client, device or intended Consumer. Automatically generating a UI to provide immediate feedback to developers, testers, integrators, and security professionals. Validating each API independently shortens the critical path and supports concurrent Agile development. Fully automated, SOAPSonar requires no scripting or script maintenance, reducing time and skill level needed. Integration with variety test management software packages and providing detailed reports for progress tracking. Regression testing can be automated, providing early identification of changes to the API or versions. Support for message and protocol layer identity standards allows for cloud testing.
    Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.
    Sample Customers
    San Diego State University, Rumson Capital Advisor, Techlogix
    Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText UFT Digital Lab is ranked 20th in Functional Testing Tools with 16 reviews. Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is rated 0.0, while OpenText UFT Digital Lab is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT Digital Lab writes "Robust solution for application lifecycle management with numerous valuable features". Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is most compared with , whereas OpenText UFT Digital Lab is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Appium, Perfecto, AWS Device Farm and Sauce Labs.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.