Compare Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs. Panaya Test Dynamix

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer.

More Panaya Test Dynamix Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
36th
Views
259
Comparisons
203
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
23rd
Views
965
Comparisons
420
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
633
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAPSonarPanaya Test Center
Learn
Crosscheck Networks
Video Not Available
Panaya
Overview
Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar provides automated testing of each API independent of client, device or intended Consumer. Automatically generating a UI to provide immediate feedback to developers, testers, integrators, and security professionals. Validating each API independently shortens the critical path and supports concurrent Agile development. Fully automated, SOAPSonar requires no scripting or script maintenance, reducing time and skill level needed. Integration with variety test management software packages and providing detailed reports for progress tracking. Regression testing can be automated, providing early identification of changes to the API or versions. Support for message and protocol layer identity standards allows for cloud testing.

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

Offer
Learn more about Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Sample Customers
San Diego State University, Rumson Capital Advisor, TechlogixAllianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Fran├žais du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB Brazil
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Media Company14%
Non Profit10%
Comms Service Provider6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools while Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is rated 0, while Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is most compared with SoapUI Pro and Parasoft SOAtest, whereas Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.