We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the indicator of compromise, which show you what file was either quarantined or removed."
"CrowdStrike Falcon has done an excellent job at detecting breaches. It has allowed us to stay in business and keep our systems up."
"There's almost no maintenance required. It's very low if there's any at all."
"I like the detection rates of mobile threats."
"Probably the most valuable thing to me is the real-time response piece. The fact that I can connect to an endpoint as long as it is on the Internet, no matter where it is globally. I can remove files from the endpoint, drop files on the endpoint, stop processes, reboot it, run custom scripts, and deploy software. Pretty much no other tool can do all that."
"The Protect functionality on the laptops provides great visibility into what's occurring, and the cloud management of the platform is what we needed."
"The stability is good; we haven't experienced any glitches or bugs."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"Too many false positives."
"There are some aspects of the UI that could use some improvement, e.g., working in groups. I build a group, then I have to manually assign prevention policies, update policies, etc., but there is no function to copy that group. So, if I wanted to make a subgroup for troubleshooting or divide workstations into groups of laptops and desktops, then I have to manually build a brand new group. I can't just copy a build from one to another. Additionally, in order to do any work within a group, I have to first do the work on the respective prevention policy page or individual policy page, then remove the group if the group is assigned to a different prevention policy, remove the prevention policy, and then add the new one in. So, it can get a little hectic. It would be easier if I could add and remove things from the group page rather than having to go into the policy pages to do it."
"The biggest issue with Falcon as a standalone product is it doesn't have very much reporting."
"CrowdStrike Suites and the way that it bundles things can be a bit challenging. It should be easier to integrate with the other stuff that they sell or be included with what they sell. We have one piece, then they are talking about another piece on vulnerability management all of the sudden, and we don't own that piece. We can see it in the console, but nothing shows up. It simply appears within the tool as an option, but we can't use it without purchasing it."
"It does take more time to scan than other solutions."
"In the future release of CrowdStrike Falcon, they should add a sandbox feature."
"I would rate it an eight out of ten. It does what it needs to do but there's always room for improvement."
"It would be nice if the dashboard had some more information upfront, and looked a little better."
"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."
"The pricing and licensing are fairly good. It is definitely not a cheap product, but I have felt that it is worth the money that we spent. So, we have discussed it in the past, and were like, "Yes, it is probably pricier than some other solutions, but we also feel they really are the leader. We are very comfortable with their level of expertise. So, it's kind of worth the price that we pay.""
"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. I don't think we are getting charged more than what it is worth. It is fair, but I do not like how it is a la carte. I realize they do that so other organizations can buy and get the agent, getting it cheaper than you could otherwise. However, if you want the main core package, which has all the main features with the exception of maybe the multi-cloud protections, that can get pricier for an organization. So, you have to pick and choose what you want. I do not care for a la carte pricing."
"Our company pays approximately US$ 65,000 annually for 900 machines."
"The pricing is not bad. It's on the higher end of the market, but you get what you pay for."
"The price is too high."
"The pricing could be reduced. If it was more reasonable that would be great."
"Our licensing fees were between $50,000 and $60,000 per year, which was pretty expensive for a small business."
"The pricing on CrowdStrike is per license. It was about $42 per seat yearly."
CrowdStrike is the leader in cloud-delivered next-generation endpoint protection. CrowdStrike has revolutionized endpoint protection by being the first and only company to unify next-generation antivirus (AV), endpoint detection and response (EDR), and a 24/7 managed hunting service — all delivered via a single lightweight agent.
Many of the world’s largest organizations already put their trust in CrowdStrike, including three of the 10 largest global companies by revenue, five of the 10 largest financial institutions, three of the top 10 health care providers, and three of the top 10 energy companies.
Request a free trial here: https://go.crowdstrike.com/try-falcon-prevent
See Everything. Predict What Matters.
Understand your risk and know which vulnerabilities to fix first with Tenable.io
Get a risk-based view of your entire attack surface—from IT to cloud to containers—so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize vulnerabilities.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Nessus technology, Tenable.io provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with the ability to predict which security issues to remediate first. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.
Protect your organization from all threats - not just malware - even when computers and servers aren’t connected to the internet. Start your free trial and deploy CrowdStrike Falcon within minutes to start receiving full threat protection.
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 1st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 27 reviews while Tenable.ep is ranked 26th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Tenable.ep is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Speeds up the data collection for our phishing playbooks dramatically". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.ep writes "Good pricing, responsive technical support, and great for risk management". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Darktrace and Carbon Black CB Defense, whereas Tenable.ep is most compared with Pentera.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.