Compare Cumulocity IoT vs. OpenText IoT Platform

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cumulocity IoT Logo
208 views|157 comparisons
OpenText IoT Platform  Logo
37 views|25 comparisons
Ranking
8th
out of 31 in IoT Platforms
Views
208
Comparisons
157
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
25th
out of 31 in IoT Platforms
Views
37
Comparisons
25
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Let’s keep IoT simple.
Welcome to the stress-free IoT platform! Cumulocity IoT was built from the ground up to be open, rapid to deploy and distributed. You can connect any “thing” and get started in minutes. Simplify with one architecture—from the edge to cloud and on-premises. Monitor and respond to IoT data in real time. No coding needed!

The OpenText IoT Platform provides an identity-centric approach to managing day to day operations of industrial assets and connected things. ... Transforms the operation of downstream business systems and improves customer engagement, using lifecycle data obtained from industrial assets.

Offer
Learn more about Cumulocity IoT
Learn more about OpenText IoT Platform
Sample Customers
Deutsche Telekom, MicroTechnology
The Auto Club Group (ACG), SITE Centers, Hospital system, Temperzone Australia

Cumulocity IoT is ranked 8th in IoT Platforms while OpenText IoT Platform is ranked 25th in IoT Platforms. Cumulocity IoT is rated 0.0, while OpenText IoT Platform is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cumulocity IoT is most compared with AWS IoT Greengrass, AWS IoT Device Management, Jasper Platform, Oracle Internet of Things Cloud Service and Azure IoT Central, whereas OpenText IoT Platform is most compared with .

See our list of best IoT Platforms vendors.

We monitor all IoT Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.