CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Malwarebytes comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Malwarebytes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Malwarebytes Report (Updated: May 2022).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them.""The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is.""We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment.""The solution is scalable.""This is the number one product for privilege account security.""We can do both server and endpoint protection.""The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution.""The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pros →

"Being able to carry out a full scan on your system.""When it comes to frontend protections, it has some of the best definitions. In addition, they do traditional signature and heuristic detection a lot better than Microsoft and some other players in that space.""The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided.""It gets the job done, and they are consistently updating it monthly.""The protection is really good with Malwarebytes. It's also user friendly and quite easy to set up.""The solution has a good management interface.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that I can use it wherever I want, be it at the office, at home, or even outside.""It allows us to have better knowledge of the way people use the tool and how we can improve their workflows."

More Malwarebytes Pros →

Cons
"The solution is very expensive.""It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage.""It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved.""One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices.""CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution.""CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file.""The solution's pricing could be better.""We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Cons →

"I would like to see integration with other vendors going forward.""I would like to see a little more detail in the log. So, when an event occurs, I'd like to know not just when it happened and on what device, but what activity was taking place on the machine at the time so that we can drill down. If we get a false positive, we have to do a lot of research and go back and forth with our end-users to know why it was a false positive. So, having a little more detail around detections and events would probably be my most asked feature.""It would be better if updates could be downloaded, and deployed, on-premises to avoid low bandwidth causing issues.""We have noticed that when the solution is doing the scanning, all the scanning activities make the device heavier. It slows down your machine.""This solution reports far too many false positives!""We experience a lot of false positives.""Overall, I haven't found any ways the solution lacks in features or usability.""Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

More Malwarebytes Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."
  • "I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."
  • "Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."
  • "The cost for CyberArk is very high."
  • "The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."
  • "The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."
  • "We pay about $17 per user."
  • "CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."
  • More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Yearly, it is around $50 per client."
  • "We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."
  • "Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."
  • "I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."
  • "It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."
  • "Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."
  • More Malwarebytes Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpoint… more »
    Top Answer:The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it… more »
    Top Answer:It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point.
    Top Answer:The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation… more »
    Top Answer:A solution must be installed in the main gateway to give an overview of the incoming and outgoing traffic. The technical support team's response time should be faster.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,602
    Comparisons
    1,096
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    632
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    7,182
    Comparisons
    6,091
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Viewfinity
    Learn More
    Overview

    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

    Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

    Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection is delivered via Malwarebytes cloud-based endpoint management platform, is an advanced threat prevention solution for endpoints that uses a layered approach with multiple detection techniques. Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection employs multiple techniques to identify and defend against attacks at all stages of the attack chain using a highly effective mix of signature-less and matching-technology layers working both pre- and post-execution. Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection leverages our Linking Engine technology to remove all traces of infections and related artifacts - not just the primary threat payload. Its Endpoint Protection technology reduces the vulnerability surface, making the endpoint more resilient.

    Sample Customers
    Knutson Construction
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Government7%
    Hospitality Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    University9%
    Government7%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Malwarebytes
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Malwarebytes and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 25 reviews while Malwarebytes is ranked 29th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 32 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Malwarebytes is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Malwarebytes writes "Intuitive, easy to use, and does a good job of catching and stopping things for the most part and has a unique rollback feature". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Malwarebytes is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and HP Wolf Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Malwarebytes report.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.