We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"The product is stable."
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them."
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"The solution is scalable."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."
"The extendability is great."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"Provides protection against threats."
"I have not received any complaints about the performance."
"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."
"They need much better integration with Azure AD."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."
"The product’s on-premise version is costly in terms of extra charges for SQL database and Windows server licenses."
"If you have another endpoint product running on the same machine, you have to fine tune functions from FireEye to avoid performance and user experience issues."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 18th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 48 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
