We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and HashiCorp Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The logs and reporting features are impressive."
"Super stable and easy to scale"
"We use the solution for password vaulting, password rotation, session management, and secret management."
"If properly set up, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault has good stability, and is a very solid tool. It can run by itself. Its most valuable features are auto password recycling and PSM."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault are password rotations and password encryptions."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault are password vaulting and automatic rotation of passwords after use."
"The tool has safe vaults. We keep our passwords in the Vault. The tool’s recording feature is also valuable for us."
"Password Vault's main advantage is its scalability. We constantly see huge enterprises implementing something like this, and the privileged session management is an excellent piece. You can kind of watch videos of whatever an admin has done."
"It is user-friendly and easy to implement from any application point."
"The interface is very simple to navigate."
"It can still be configured by a separate team other than developers. That's why I think it's more secure."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is the management of tickets in the pipeline."
"The solution is stable. It has been working perfectly without any problem."
"It's stable. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
"It is a good product to consider for companies who are looking to build on-premise or hybrid infrastructure."
"The product is free and easy to use. It is well documented with an easy implementation process."
"I would prefer that this is a fully-managed service, rather than have to manage the software ourselves and keep it up to date."
"The technical support is very poor."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault can improve the distributive vault feature. Distributing the vault in multiple areas and multiple data centers should improve."
"The stability depends on the infrastructure it is installed on, which is important because CyberArk does not have the hardware appliance."
"Upgrading the product is very difficult, so this could be an area for improvement."
"The challenge with the product is pricing since it's expensive. It also needs to improve the customization. We encountered some stability issues as well."
"I would like to see a simplification of the product."
"We should be able to join small components."
"There could be a plugin for the database to change the secret automatically. It would be an efficient feature for password security."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
"The product needs to improve its customization. It should be also more like easy to plug and play."
"I would rate the stability a six out of ten. There are some bugs and glitches. We are in touch with the vendor to resolve them."
"A drawback for some clients who have to be PCI compliant is that they still need to use and subscribe to an HSM (Hardware Security Module) solution."
"In terms of features, the only thing that I found a little bit hinky was that there was no revocation or deletion on the model we were using. Once in a financial year, a client interacts, and you pay for that client for the year. So, there are just little things like that in the pricing. There should be more clarity around the end of the key. I know there is no system like this. They all are the same. I tested Microsoft, Google, and some others, and none of them really want you to delete a key, which makes sense. You delete a key, and you lose everything that it has wrapped or encrypted, but it's actually just a language. Deletion isn't really deletion. It's really revocation, but overall, HashiCorp Vault ticked all the boxes for us, and I couldn't fault it."
"I don't think there are any major improvements required—so far, so good. However, I think that having more training materials, such as videos, and documentation available would be helpful. I would prefer to have more videos available either on the official site or on YouTube."
"The onboarding is a challenge. It should be more self-service, but it involves reviews and approvals."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 47 reviews while HashiCorp Vault is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Password Managers with 15 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Easy to manage and maintain the password API but stability could be improved". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Password Safe and LastPass, whereas HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, Keeper and BeyondTrust Password Safe. See our CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. HashiCorp Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.