Compare CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. Imprivata OneSign

CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 1st in Enterprise Password Managers with 10 reviews while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 9.0, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Improves our ability to control, secure, and manage access across the enterprise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Has an easy log in that enables us to use one single ID for signing into more than fifty applications". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Azure Key Vault, Thycotic Secret Server, LastPass Enterprise and Devolutions Password Hub, whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, LastPass Enterprise, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso and ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Thycotic, LogMeIn and others in Enterprise Password Managers. Updated: June 2020.
426,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the ability to delegate access to admins when they need it.Service count rotation is probably one of my favorite features... The ability to automatically rotate any password I need to really helps with the entire enterprise strategy that we're pushing right now.The most valuable feature is the special management. It records the activity and the actions that we use for auditing.The most valuable feature is that it is flexible. It has many connectors. that have done well, the EPV and SSH sessions are all being recorded and everything works fine.Session monitoring is excellent. It may be the solution's most valuable aspect.Our most valuable features would probably be key rotation, the SKM or SSH key manager, and account discovery.Security is the solution's most valuable feature. As far as I know, this solution is the most secure system of this class on the market today, even considering another management system like Fudo Security, which we also use. The integration capabilities are very good; it helps strengthen our overall security.Thus far I can say technical support is excellent. We haven't had any issues or difficulties.

More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pros »

It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack.

More Imprivata OneSign Pros »

Cons
I would prefer that this is a fully-managed service, rather than have to manage the software ourselves and keep it up to date.I'd like it to be a little more granular. I want a little bit more control over exactly what we do. I know if you do that, you add more knobs and dials to deal with, but that's just my personal approach: granular access.The stability depends on the infrastructure it is installed on, which is important because CyberArk does not have the hardware appliance.In the next release, they could simplify the setup and I would like some tasks added like file sharing. When a client connects to CyberArk and wants to put a file on the server, they cannot.The initial setup could be simplified. Right now, in comparison to its nearest competitors, it's quite complex.I think they can improve account onboarding. For instance, you have to use the Password Vault utility, whereas in Thycotic I think there is a feature in the user interface that allows you to upload your account with an Excel file. So I'd like to have a similar thing in CyberArk.The solution is too big and complex for any businesses that are small or medium-sized. They should offer a more compact version or make a solution better suited to smaller businesses.To get it to a ten it should give other possibilities to select if you could follow the keystrokes. It should have a flexibility with things where people can use it a lot faster.

More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Cons »

I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications.

More Imprivata OneSign Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this solution is expensive.This solution is expensive.

More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice »

The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution.

More Imprivata OneSign Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.
426,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
6,962
Comparisons
4,110
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
437
Avg. Rating
8.9
10th
Views
1,240
Comparisons
898
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
399
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management
Learn
CyberArk
Imprivata
Overview
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, a component of the CyberArk Privileged Account Security Solution, is designed to discover, secure, rotate and control access to privileged account passwords used to access systems throughout the enterprise IT environment. The solution enables organizations to understand the scope of their privileged account risks and put controls in place to mitigate those risks. Flexible policies enable organizations to enforce granular privileged access controls, automate workflows and rotate passwords at a regular cadence without requiring manual IT effort. To demonstrate compliance, organizations can easily report on which users accessed what privileged accounts, when and why.

Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
Learn more about Imprivata OneSign
Sample Customers
AstraZeneca, Time, DBS, Novartis, Motorola, BT, pwc, Braun, Deloitte, Williams, Revlon, Belgacom, BarclaysAZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm27%
Energy/Utilities Company18%
Retailer18%
Comms Service Provider9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company46%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company7%
Insurance Company7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Thycotic, LogMeIn and others in Enterprise Password Managers. Updated: June 2020.
426,487 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of .

We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.