We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HashiCorp, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Enterprise Password Managers."Session monitoring is excellent. It may be the solution's most valuable aspect."
"PSM enables after-hours monitoring."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"I love how easily we could operate within Password Vault and get things done. It was almost effortless."
"CyberArk's GUI is user friendly."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault are password rotations and password encryptions."
"The logs and reporting features are impressive."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it's the best in the market. I haven't seen any other PAM solutions better than CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault."
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"CyberArk has two disadvantages; the first is that it's insanely expensive and the other is it's very complex."
"We should be able to join small components."
"The initial setup can get complex."
"The technical support is very poor."
"The tool needs to improve its usage and interface. They need to have a modern and useful interface. I want the product to improve its integration capabilities as well since some of the integration features do not work always."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault must incorporate connectors for password and session managers in the marketplace."
"The tool's UI has bugs and lags. It needs to be improved. The deployment process can be complex due to multiple components for various functionalities, each requiring separate infrastructure management. To simplify this process, consolidating all these components into a single platform could be beneficial. The product's pricing could be cheaper."
"There was a situation when one of our presidents had an issue, but I can't recall the specifics."
"They should have a landing page."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 47 reviews while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server and BeyondTrust Password Safe, whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Auth0 and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.