We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and Azure Key Vault based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Azure is the winner in this comparison. Reviewers are happier with its ease of deployment and with its price.
"Azure Key Vault's performance is excellent. It makes infrastructure management easier."
"The product's integration capabilities are good."
"The access policy feature helps secure content and resources."
"The solution's technical support is good. My company received support from Microsoft whenever we needed it."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Key Vault is the secret storage of data."
"The tool is highly secure and very easy to manage."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the search for secrets feature that we use to store our passwords and connection strings."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and enabling our clients to manage keys."
"CyberArk makes our environment more secure and prevents possible attacks by compromised accounts."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault are password rotations and password encryptions."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it's the best in the market. I haven't seen any other PAM solutions better than CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault."
"In terms of stability, there are no complaints."
"We use the solution for password vaulting, password rotation, session management, and secret management."
"Thus far I can say technical support is excellent. We haven't had any issues or difficulties."
"The ability to monitor privileged accounts throughout the enterprises."
"The logs and reporting features are impressive."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"Many times, the first round of support itself will fail, and they will bring some more competent people in the subsequent support. So it gets into a hierarchical mode. By then, we will lose a good amount of time. The technical support needs improvement."
"If you check the capabilities of other key management services across Amazon, HashiCorp, and Google, there are features that Key Vault doesn't have. It could be the case that when you use Key Vault, you might be forced to use a third-party solution to get certain services. If those services could be included in Key Vault, there would be diminished reasons to go for a third-party key management system."
"The solution needs to improve reliability and protection."
"The platform's configuration process could be easier."
"The solution's usage can be a little better from the user interface point of view."
"One of my previous clients was one of the big banks here in the Netherlands and the EU courts have stated that Microsoft Azure Key Vault is not, according to their perspective, secure due to the fact that Microsoft has access to Key Vault."
"Azure Key Vault is only available for Microsoft services, and it should be exposed to non-Microsoft cloud services, like GCP and Amazon."
"What needs to be improved in CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is their customer support, particularly in terms of responsiveness, willingness to help, and being more understanding. The initial setup and upgrade process for the solution is complex and can only be done by CyberArk, so this is another area for improvement."
"Upgrading the product is very difficult, so this could be an area for improvement."
"The initial setup could be simplified. Right now, in comparison to its nearest competitors, it's quite complex."
"The solution is too complicated to use and should be simplified. It took me a long time to understand how to use it. There is a lot that the solution can improve for the future."
"The initial setup could be simpler but it may not be as effective."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault can improve the distributive vault feature. Distributing the vault in multiple areas and multiple data centers should improve."
"I would like to see more integration with more tools, for more APIs."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's GUI has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Key Vault is ranked 1st in Enterprise Password Managers with 46 reviews while CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews. Azure Key Vault is rated 8.6, while CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Key Vault writes "Allows us to securely store our keys to prevent unauthorized access to unwanted users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". Azure Key Vault is most compared with AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Certificate Manager, Delinea Secret Server and 1Password, whereas CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Password Safe and LastPass. See our Azure Key Vault vs. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.