We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and SolarWinds Passportal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HashiCorp, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Enterprise Password Managers."The password rotation and cyber gateway have been quite useful."
"We use the solution for password vaulting, password rotation, session management, and secret management."
"If properly set up, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault has good stability, and is a very solid tool. It can run by itself. Its most valuable features are auto password recycling and PSM."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to delegate access to admins when they need it."
"CyberArk is a good and adaptive solution. It is easy to adopt and install. It is easy for every use case."
"CyberArk makes our environment more secure and prevents possible attacks by compromised accounts."
"Super stable and easy to scale"
"The accounts are maintained automatically. Hence, resource and administration costs are less."
"Passportal is very stable."
"I like Passportal's extensions. You can click the particular company you want and go through all the passwords and usernames associated with that company or the specific webpage you're on or their server or whatever. It's a whole lot faster."
"The only problem involves granting access to people who are authorized to view it."
"The initial setup could be simplified. Right now, in comparison to its nearest competitors, it's quite complex."
"The interface could be improved it is not user-friendly, but they have improved but it could still improve. In the policies configuration, it would be a benefit to have more details."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault can improve the distributive vault feature. Distributing the vault in multiple areas and multiple data centers should improve."
"What needs to be improved in CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is their customer support, particularly in terms of responsiveness, willingness to help, and being more understanding. The initial setup and upgrade process for the solution is complex and can only be done by CyberArk, so this is another area for improvement."
"CyberArk has two disadvantages; the first is that it's insanely expensive and the other is it's very complex."
"Upgrading the product is very difficult, so this could be an area for improvement."
"I think they can improve account onboarding. For instance, you have to use the Password Vault utility, whereas in Thycotic I think there is a feature in the user interface that allows you to upload your account with an Excel file. So I'd like to have a similar thing in CyberArk."
"In the future, I would like the ability to have diagrams, such as those created by Visio, available directly in Passportal."
"It goes down a little too often for me to recommend it to somebody else."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews while SolarWinds Passportal is ranked 22nd in Enterprise Password Managers. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while SolarWinds Passportal is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Passportal writes "With its extension, I can quickly access login information without opening a new browser window". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server and BeyondTrust Password Safe, whereas SolarWinds Passportal is most compared with BeyondTrust Password Safe.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.