Compare CyberArk Identity vs. ForgeRock

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk Identity Logo
1,370 views|1,023 comparisons
ForgeRock Logo
7,219 views|4,927 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. ForgeRock and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory.""The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."

More CyberArk Identity Pros »

"The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent.""The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable.""We create and define the permissions and configurations for the users.""ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready.""Even though we have very small business interests with them today, they see that we plan on growing drastically over the next two years. Therefore, we have excellent support and we are now at a point where we are not calling tech support. We pick up a phone and call the Account Manager and they'll get everything resolved for us. We don't have to queue along with everybody else and go through a long process.""I like the intelligent authentication feature.""Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users."

More ForgeRock Pros »

Cons
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices.""They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

More CyberArk Identity Cons »

"The identity management model needs a bit of improvement.""They should improve the solution by include reporting.""I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive.""Automatic Deployment needs improvement. it could be made easier.""We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced.""It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers.""It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement."

More ForgeRock Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

More CyberArk Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's a bit pricey and could be more competitive.""We have multiple clients we are looking at right now. We are at a very small number, however, the idea and the goal is to grow. We are looking at about $100,000 and $50,000 a minimum a month cost. That'd be minimum maybe in a couple of years.""Its price is comparable to other products in the market.""Its licensing is on a yearly basis, but it also depends on the contract that you have with the vendor. They have multiple types of contracts. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees. If you need some of the features, you have to pay more."

More ForgeRock Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security.
Top Answer: They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature.
Top Answer: We sell as well as use this solution for our IT operations. We are using it for single sign-on. We are a small company, and we have a few users of this solution.
Top Answer: Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users.
Top Answer: Its licensing is on a yearly basis, but it also depends on the contract that you have with the vendor. They have multiple types of contracts. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees… more »
Top Answer: It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement.
Ranking
10th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
1,370
Comparisons
1,023
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
298
Rating
9.0
3rd
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
7,219
Comparisons
4,927
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
466
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Idaptive
ForgeRock Identity Platform, ForgeRock OpenIDM
Learn More
Overview

GRANT ACCESS TO YOUR WORKFORCE. GIVE NOTHING TO ATTACKERS.
Your users need quick access to a variety of business resources. You need confidence it’s them knocking – not an attacker. With CyberArk Workforce Identity, you can empower your workforce while keeping threats out.

Frictionless Sign On
Keep workers working, not logging in and out.

Adaptive Authentication
Make intelligent access decisions based on AI-powered analytics.

Secure Everywhere
Enable access across any device, anywhere at just the right time.

Open source provisioning solution for real-time user management life cycle automation.
Offer
Learn more about CyberArk Identity
Learn more about ForgeRock
Sample Customers
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Comms Service Provider8%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. ForgeRock and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CyberArk Identity is ranked 10th in Access Management with 2 reviews while ForgeRock is ranked 3rd in Access Management with 7 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 9.0, while ForgeRock is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "A stable solution for accessing on-premises active directory". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Good for multi-client setups and easy to implement but the scalability seems uncertain". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Azure Active Directory, Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Intune, SailPoint IdentityNow and LastPass Enterprise, whereas ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Azure Active Directory, Okta Workforce Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and OpenIAM Identity Governance. See our CyberArk Identity vs. ForgeRock report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.