Compare CyberArk Identity vs. Soffid

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk Identity Logo
1,370 views|1,023 comparisons
Soffid Logo
36 views|23 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Fortinet, Keeper and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

More CyberArk Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security.
Top Answer: They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature.
Top Answer: We sell as well as use this solution for our IT operations. We are using it for single sign-on. We are a small company, and we have a few users of this solution.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
10th
Views
1,370
Comparisons
1,023
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
298
Rating
9.0
29th
Views
36
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Idaptive
Learn More
Soffid
Video Not Available
Overview

GRANT ACCESS TO YOUR WORKFORCE. GIVE NOTHING TO ATTACKERS.
Your users need quick access to a variety of business resources. You need confidence it’s them knocking – not an attacker. With CyberArk Workforce Identity, you can empower your workforce while keeping threats out.

Frictionless Sign On
Keep workers working, not logging in and out.

Adaptive Authentication
Make intelligent access decisions based on AI-powered analytics.

Secure Everywhere
Enable access across any device, anywhere at just the right time.

Facilitate usage of mobile devices
Soffid admin and self service portals are fully compatible with any web browser and on any tablet or mobile device. Because security does not come as a tradeoff with flexibility, you can access Soffid when you want it and how you want it.

Access Recertification
Access recertification is an IT Control that involves auditing user Access Privileges to determine if they are correct and adhere to the organization’s internal policies and compliance regulations.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk Identity
Learn more about Soffid
Sample Customers
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
PCC, Corporacion Favorita, Donostia San Sebastian, Govern Illes Balears, Cerrejon mineria responsable
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Comms Service Provider7%
Government7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Fortinet, Keeper and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CyberArk Identity is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Soffid is ranked 29th in Single Sign-On (SSO). CyberArk Identity is rated 9.0, while Soffid is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "A stable solution for accessing on-premises active directory". On the other hand, CyberArk Identity is most compared with Azure Active Directory, Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Intune, SailPoint IdentityNow and LastPass Enterprise, whereas Soffid is most compared with .

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.