We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS."
"The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"If anyone makes an error, or if an incident occurs by accident, the business will not be harmed as a result of this activity."
"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area."
"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."
"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
Earn 20 points
CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO). CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM).
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
