We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"For me, the integration of AirWatch with various enterprise components is something I like. The way they are partnering with various services, like security services, or some of the big guys like Google, Android, Apple, and including Microsoft; that's really awesome. And the way they look at providing functionality to create self-service and automation, that's really usefully and beneficial. That's where I see they differentiate themselves."
"You can put all your applications on a mobile device, be it a phone or tablet. It is secure and easy to use. Because it is centrally managed, you don't have to do any configuration on the phone. I just got the phone and connected to the central applications. I just downloaded one thing and everything got rolled out. Email, calendar, and other things were deployed centrally. If you don't have AirWatch, you have to configure your phone manually. For example, you need to deploy and configure your email manually and then synchronize everything. It is much simpler when a mobile device is centrally managed."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Workspace ONE is that it can support most end users' enterprise applications."
"The initial setup is easy and the deployment doesn't take too long."
"We can impose cybersecurity requirements."
"Workspace ONE has something like an orchestrator model that allows me to configure a set of steps to onboard new PCs, laptops, or tablets. So, it makes my work easy."
"A very easy to use solution."
"It has good stability."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"More integrations would be better."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."
"We'd like more useful support."
"The reverse proxy is not intuitive and it takes time to get it right, so this is something that can be improved."
"The bigger vendors like VMware, Insight, and MobileIron can assign engineers to customers. You can work with them to develop the right competency to use the product."
"Windows 10 management is there, but VMware only recently developed that part, and it's not fully mature. Patch management and other integrations are there as well as the application-pushing part, command line, mandatory commands, etc. Some out-of-the-box solutions should be available to better integrate a broader range of applications and handle application push. That's the roadmap we should look at."
"The SaaS environment is not very responsive at times, so the performance can be improved in that regard."
"They do have a good integration, but there is a long way to go as far as integration is concerned. They need to integrate with the cloud solutions a little bit more. We are looking for Azure integration."
"Pricing is a limitation. I think it's on the higher side, so if it were cheaper, it would benefit more organizations."
"The mobile device repository is somewhat difficult to manage with a large user base."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 2nd in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 81 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Microsoft BitLocker, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
