Compare CyberArk PAS vs. FireEye Network Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. FireEye Network Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The threat analytics is an important feature.""I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature.""The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out.""This solution is quite stable.""We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.""We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability.""There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.""For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks."

More CyberArk PAS Pros »

"The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security.""We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up.""Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser.""Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening.""The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.""It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us.""Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities.""The most valuable feature is the view into the application."

More FireEye Network Security Pros »

Cons
"The usual workload is sometimes delayed by the solution.""If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature.""Tech support staff can be more proactive.""There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar.""I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution.""Make it easier to deploy.""The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.""Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server."

More CyberArk PAS Cons »

"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit.""Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement.""The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this.""It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there. A known threat can be coming into the network and we would want the cloud to look up the problem. I would also like to see them develop more file replication and machine learning.""The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right.""I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports.""Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier.""A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see."

More FireEye Network Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.""This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.""In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product."

More CyberArk PAS Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors.""The pricing is a little high.""Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold.""There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product.""We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing.""FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market.""When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive.""The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

More FireEye Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.
Top Answer: Privileged Access Management is a business transformation program. It forces business to look at their overall operating model for system administrative and application based access, and develop a… more »
Top Answer: We're pretty excited about Alero, the third-party access management. As a small company we lean on vendors quite a bit and we do that in multiple areas. That's going to be a big one for us. It's just… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email.
Top Answer: It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto. They should be sharing their threat database and information. For… more »
Top Answer: We use FireEye to protect our web and email traffic.
Ranking
Views
38,189
Comparisons
18,074
Reviews
25
Average Words per Review
508
Avg. Rating
9.1
Views
7,709
Comparisons
5,340
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
384
Avg. Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerFireEye
Learn
CyberArk
FireEye
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

FireEye Network Security is an advanced threat protection and breach detection platform that provides industry leading threat visibility and protection against the world’s most sophisticated and damaging attacks. By leveraging FireEye’s unique technologies and threat intelligence, FireEye Network Security detects what other security solutions miss, providing holistic security from the perimeter to the network core.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about FireEye Network Security
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationFFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
University17%
Manufacturing Company17%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise76%
REVIEWERS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise37%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. FireEye Network Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 25 reviews while FireEye Network Security is ranked 4th in Advanced Threat Protection with 13 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while FireEye Network Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FireEye Network Security writes "It has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas FireEye Network Security is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Stealthwatch, Zscaler Internet Access, Symantec Advanced Threat Protection and Juniper SRX. See our CyberArk PAS vs. FireEye Network Security report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.