Most Helpful Review
Use i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management? Share your opinion.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks."
"The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task."
"When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution."
"Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control."
"CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale."
"CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies."
"The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,"
"The technical support is good."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."
"Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server."
"Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."
"The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time."
"It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers."
"CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms."
"There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution."
"It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration"
"We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process."
"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."
out of 30 in Privileged Access Management
Average Words per Review
out of 31 in Single Sign-On (SSO)
Average Words per Review
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 65% of the time.
Compared 35% of the time.
Also Known As
|CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager||AccessMatrix Universal Access Management, i-Sprint Innovations AccessMatrix, AccessMatrix|
CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.
AccessMatrix is a suite of integrated ICAM (Identity, Credential, Access Management and Versatile Authentication solutions) that enable organizations to effectively deploy versatile authentication, unified single sign-on, secure credential management services, flexible identity & role administration, externalized authorization, and provide comprehensive data analytics of access to important information assets.
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management
|Rockwell Automation||IRAS, Singapore Bank|
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider8%
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
No Data Available
CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 19 reviews while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 14th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.2, while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "Good product with the flexibility to connect to any token". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with IBM Security Access Manager and Entrust IdentityGuard.
See our list of .
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.