We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."Enterprise Password Vault, Privilege Session Manager, and Application Identity Management have been very useful for our client environment."
"The solution is scalable."
"It is a single tool that isolates possible kinds of malware. You get lateral movement blocking and auditing information, e.g., you know who is doing what. You are getting protections from the service as well as a useful environment. All your admins can easily go in and out of your company while accessing your servers in a secure way, even if they are working abroad."
"The product has allowed us to improve both the management and access to privileged credentials, while also creating a full audit trail of all activities happening within isolated sessions of all tasks and activities taking place within the solution."
"Performance-wise, it is excellent."
"The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,"
"It helps our customers in their software requirement imports."
"Its' quite stable."
"Lifecycle management, governance and documentation."
"I would rate the price eight out of 10, with 10 as the best value for money."
More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Pros →
"The continuous scanning of the assets is limited to Windows and Unix. We like to have the solution scan any databases, network devices, and security devices for privileged accounts. That would be very helpful."
"The interface on version 9 looks old."
"The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it."
"As they grow, the technical support is having growing pains. One of the things is just being able to get somebody on the phone sometimes."
"Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support."
"I would like to see is the policy export and import. When we expend, we do not want to just hand do a policy."
"Some aspects of the administration need improvement, though they have recently made improvements to the API. However, the management with the interface and configuration are not so user-friendly. It has not changed much during all the years that CyberArk has been on the market. The management part, like platform management as well as PSM connectors definition and management, could be improved, even if it has already been done with the API."
"There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar."
"Self service center is not always easy to understand."
"The solution is a bit pricey for some regions."
More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Cons →
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is ranked 11th in User Provisioning Software with 2 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence writes "We use the solution to ensure organizations conform to industry base certifications and best practices". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Identity Manager, Saviynt and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
