Compare CyberArk PAS vs. NetIQ Access Manager

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Access Management with 53 reviews while NetIQ Access Manager which is ranked 13th in Access Management with 1 review. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while NetIQ Access Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Easy to integrate with lots of different applications". CyberArk PAS is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with CA SSO and Oracle Access Manager.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use NetIQ Access Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, CA Technologies and others in Access Management. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability.This solution is quite stable.The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out.I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature.

Read more »

There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs.

Read more »

Cons
Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.Make it easier to deploy.I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution.There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar.If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature.Tech support staff can be more proactive.

Read more »

The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect.With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time.If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it.Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 22 in Access Management
Views
48,137
Comparisons
15,836
Reviews
51
Average Words per Review
570
Avg. Rating
9.0
13th
out of 22 in Access Management
Views
538
Comparisons
160
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
263
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 63% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Learn
CyberArk
Micro Focus
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.
Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about NetIQ Access Manager
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationBancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company10%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm26%
Retailer12%
Comms Service Provider11%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, CA Technologies and others in Access Management. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email