We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It takes people out of the machine work of ensuring credentials remain up-to-date, and handles connection brokering such that human usage and credential management remain independent."
"We know when passwords will be expiring so we can force users to change their passwords, as well as requiring specific password requirements for length, complexity, etc."
"I appreciate the ease of use for support analysts."
"Automatic password management, which will automatically change passwords based on compliance requirements."
"There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product."
"It has helped from an auditing perspective identify who has access to privileged accounts."
"CyberArk has helped us to identify, store, protect, and monitor the usage of privileged accounts."
"We found the initial setup to be easy."
"Privileged Access Suite's best feature is it's straightforward to use."
"The most valuable features are session and password management."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it is easy to use."
"It is very complex and difficult to set up the solution."
"If there is an area that has room for improvement, it's probably working with their support and getting people on the phone. That is hard to do with most products in general, but that seems to be the difficult area. The product is fantastic, but sometimes we want somebody on the phone."
"They can do a better job in the PSM space."
"I would like easier integrations for creating an online dashboard that executives would look at or are able to run reports from the tool."
"It should be easier to install. It is a comprehensive product, which makes it difficult to install. You need to have their consulting services in order to get it all installed and set up correctly because there is so much going on. It would be nice if there were an easier way to do the installation without professional services. I suspect they get a fair amount of their money from professional services. So, there is not a huge incentive."
"I'm not a fan of technical support with CyberArk. It's like jumping through red tape and hoops. Quite frankly, it's almost like when you call CyberArk you get the Help Desk or the level-one. I'm a level-one. I got the CCD, I know how to do the initial troubleshooting. When I call CyberArk it's because I can't figure the problem out. So I need a level-two, three, four. I don't need you to tell me, "Hey, open a ticket and then give me logs.""
"I would love them to improve their UI customizing features."
"I would like to see improvement in the custom connector for integration with different devices."
"Privileged Access Suite's interface could be better."
"There is a new trend of not having any privileged users or accounts."
"Product management should be improved."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix is ranked 20th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix writes "A reliable solution with great password and session management". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix is most compared with ManageEngine PAM360 and WALLIX Bastion. See our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. One Identity Privileged Access Suite for Unix report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.