We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and OneLogin by One Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Performance-wise, it is excellent."
"On the customer accounts side, our account managers are responsive. If you ask them, they will get you whomever you need."
"I like the integrations for external applications."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the vault. I am satisfied with the interface and the documentation."
"Technical support is very helpful whenever we have any questions."
"AIM has been a great help in automating password retrieval which removes the need for hard-coded credentials."
"We are able to rotate privileged user passwords to eliminate fraudulent use."
"Securely protects our TAP/NUID and privileged access accounts within the company."
"Once I made the OneLogin ID, it would essentially make user names and passwords for every application that we had."
"When it comes to access management, the solution's single pane of glass is extremely important. The single pane of glass for access management enables collaborative work between IT and security. We have access to certain applications that require device trust. Based on the role, we can access those applications through OneLogin Desktop."
"Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin."
"In my role, the most valuable features are two-factor authentication and self-service password reset. The most helpful feature for the institution as a whole is probably the single sign-on. As an IT director, I care about security and ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the ease with which we can manage the sign-on feature."
"The solution allows the user to search logs based on a specific time."
"Documentation."
"Ease of integration with AD."
"The PTA could be improved. Currently, companies often have multiple domains and sometimes it's difficult to implement CyberArk in this kind of infrastructure. For example, you can add CPM (Central Policy Manager) and PSM (Privileged Session Manager and PVWA (Password Vault Web Access) for access, but if you want to add PTA (Privileged Threat Analysis) to scan Vault logs, it is difficult because this component may be adding multiple domain environments."
"The turnaround time for technical support is lengthy."
"The initial setup was somewhat complex."
"As they grow, the technical support is having growing pains. One of the things is just being able to get somebody on the phone sometimes."
"It is web-based, but other competitors have apps. We need to get there. It is just smoother to have an app. You don't have all the bugs from having a browser, and people like them better, since you can get to them via mobile."
"The product is very vaulting-focused. I'd love to see it expanding its capabilities a bit further into areas like just-in-time elevation, and access with non-vaulted credentials."
"Make it easier to deploy."
"Overall what I would really love to see is the third-party PAS reporter tool pulled more into the overall solution, ideally as its own deployable component service installation package."
"More off-hour support."
"The solution keeps going down for many hours, which impacts the entire company. You can't access any applications. OneLogin Desktop has a huge problem where it locks your computers and you need to reset the whole computer, which is pretty insane."
"The tool must be made more robust."
"To offboard, you have to manually click on this checklist, each of the checkmarks. It would actually be really nice if, for offboarding someone, you just click "offboard" and it automatically runs a script to do that."
"This product doesn't necessarily provide us with all of the functionality that we need, such as being able to share passwords with external users."
"having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."
"While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations."
"OneLogin needs to increase the number of connectors available out of the box to connect to the different endpoints. The number of out-of-box connectors should be increased."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while OneLogin by One Identity is ranked 6th in Access Management with 16 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while OneLogin by One Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneLogin by One Identity writes "Integrated well and had a single pane of glass, but downtime and pricing were issues for us". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas OneLogin by One Identity is most compared with Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, LastPass and One Identity Manager. See our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. OneLogin by One Identity report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.