Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Oracle Identity Governance

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: December 2020.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.""The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.""When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.""Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.""CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.""CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.""The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,""The technical support is good."

More CyberArk PAS Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks.""This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding.""It has a very good response time.""The solution is quite stable once you are able to overcome the bugs""The most valuable feature is the set of out-of-the-box connectors.""Good features are the RBAC and UI customization.""Understanding what a customer is using, what they are looking for, and allowing permissions is a challenge. We use the information we get in order to understand the behavior of the customer beyond the security and to understand what they have been doing in the last month. It's a nice way to understand what is attracting the customer and what they are clicking. That could be implemented by using this kind of application."

More Oracle Identity Governance Pros »

Cons
"Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.""The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.""It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.""CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.""There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.""It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration""We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process."

More CyberArk PAS Cons »

"You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement.""Simplify & add more functionality to Identity Cloud Service (IDCS).""It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability.""The initial setup is quite complex. The user interface is just awful. It's not user-friendly or intuitive at all.""The cost of this product needs to be reduced.""The user interface experience needs to be improved.""Our issues with the solution have to do with the integration with different applications. It's not easy to connect ICAO to this kind of product. It would be better to work on the extensions of the adapters for this kind of identity management solution in order to not put in the code in the product."

More Oracle Identity Governance Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The cost of support and upgrading to the next release are both expensive."

More Oracle Identity Governance Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
38,468
Comparisons
18,473
Reviews
21
Average Words per Review
546
Rating
9.1
4th
Views
4,370
Comparisons
3,130
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
489
Rating
6.9
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerOracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite
Learn
CyberArk
Oracle
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Oracle Identity Governance reduces the total cost of ownership for organizations by empowering user self-service, simplifying audit and compliance tasks and automating IT operations. By delivering a comprehensive platform for access request, role lifecycle management, access certification, closed loop remediation and privileged account management, Oracle Identity Governance is a solution that address today's requirements and enables organizations to quickly adapt to emerging requirements. Oracle Identity Governance suite provides many benefits, including: Increased end user productivity, Increased IT productivity and automation of provisioning tasks, accelerated useronboarding and stringent controls over sensitive access to shared privileged accounts, Reduced total cost and risk and Increased efficiency.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Oracle Identity Governance
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationWerkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider11%
Educational Organization5%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise72%
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise63%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: December 2020.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 13 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 4th in Identity Management (IM) with 7 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "Enables us to understand a customer's interests but it is missing a lot ". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock, Symantec Identity Governance and Administration and Microsoft Identity Manager.

See our list of .

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.