CyberArk PAS vs. SAP Access Control Comparison

CyberArk PAS

SAP Access Control

CyberArk PAS

Read 12 CyberArk PAS reviews.

38,468 views|18,473 comparisons

SAP Access Control

Read 1 SAP Access Control review.

37 views|25 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Anonymous User

Information Technology Specialist (Contract role) at a tech services company

Takes away all ambiguity around "known" admin accounts

A higher level of password rotation and usage auditing.

Use SAP Access Control? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.""The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.""When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.""Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.""CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.""CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.""The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,""The technical support is good." More CyberArk PAS Pros »	"It is an SAP product, so it integrates very well with other SAP products." More SAP Access Control Pros »
Cons
"Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.""The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.""It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.""CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.""There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.""It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration""We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process." More CyberArk PAS Cons »	"It would be better if we could also manage other systems with it. Currently, you have to purchase plugins for it to work with other non-SAP systems. It would be good if there is an easy way to integrate SAP Access Control with other non-SAP systems." More SAP Access Control Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available	"It is a part of our package with SAP. There is no extra cost in addition to the license." More SAP Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st out of 30 in Privileged Access Management Views 38,468 Comparisons 18,473 Reviews 21 Average Words per Review 546 Rating 9.1	15th out of 28 in Access Management Views 37 Comparisons 25 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 341 Rating 7.0
Popular Comparisons
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. CyberArk PAS Compared 14% of the time. Thycotic Secret Server vs. CyberArk PAS Compared 11% of the time. Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium vs. CyberArk PAS Compared 10% of the time. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs. CyberArk PAS Compared 8% of the time. SailPoint IdentityIQ vs. CyberArk PAS Compared 7% of the time. See more CyberArk PAS competitors » + Add more products to compare	Cloudflare Access vs. SAP Access Control Compared 100% of the time. See more SAP Access Control competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Learn
CyberArk	SAP
Overview
CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.	As you begin your digital transformation journey, you need robust access governance technologies to bring digital services and applications to em-ployees and business partners without exposing sensitive information to the wrong eyes. Using the SAP Access Control application as the back-bone of access governance, you can automate and accelerate administration of user access while securing your applications, processes, and data against the risk of unauthorized use.
Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS Learn More	Learn more about SAP Access Control Learn More
Sample Customers
Rockwell Automation	Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm25% Insurance Company15% Energy/Utilities Company10% Comms Service Provider8% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company32% Comms Service Provider20% Financial Services Firm8% Government5%	No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business18% Midsize Enterprise11% Large Enterprise71% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business19% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise72%	No Data Available

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 12 reviews while SAP Access Control is ranked 15th in Access Management with 1 review. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while SAP Access Control is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Access Control writes "Automates our user provisioning process and integrates very well with other SAP products but needs better integration with non-SAP products". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas SAP Access Control is most compared with Cloudflare Access.

See our list of .

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare CyberArk PAS vs. SAP Access Control