Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Securonix Security Analytics

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in User Activity Monitoring with 54 reviews while Securonix Security Analytics which is ranked 2nd in User Activity Monitoring with 4 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Securonix Security Analytics is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Securonix Security Analytics writes "Spotter tool has helped us eliminate many hours required to manually create link analysis diagrams". CyberArk PAS is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Securonix Security Analytics is most compared with Splunk, Exabeam and IBM QRadar. See our CyberArk PAS vs. Securonix Security Analytics report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Securonix Security Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability.This solution is quite stable.The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out.I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature.

Read more »

What I like most is that the threat models and risk scoring are very accurate and very helpful to the analysts on my team. They help highlight the most important things for them to look at.The second feature is that within the SNYPR product there is a functionality called Spotter. We use that for link analysis diagrams and to run the stats command. That's extremely useful because it replaces a tedious, manual process we used to use, using Microsoft Excel and a couple of other methods, to bring data together.The customizability of the tool is valuable. We are able to customize the use cases and create them easily without a large amount of Securonix assistance. It's very flexible. We do not have to rely on Professional Services to modify or create a new use case.One of the most valuable features it has is the thread chaining. One of the common issues that we always had was the number of anomalies that we used to get and the number of alerts that we used to get. But with this approach of thread chaining, we've found the false-positive rate has decreased very significantly. That was something that we never could have achieved before.The most valuable feature is being able to look at users' behavioral profiles to see what they typically access. One of the key events that we monitor is people's downloading of objects... It's very easy to see people's patterns, what they typically do.[The solution has] incident-management or case-management functionality. If someone were to download a high number and we decided we needed to investigate it, I could open a case right in the tool. It would be able to directly reference the data that they downloaded and we could open and shut the case directly in the tool, as well as report from it.

Read more »

Cons
Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.Make it easier to deploy.I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution.There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar.If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature.Tech support staff can be more proactive.

Read more »

A helpful feature would be an event export. A way to create more substantial summary reports would be nice.Other than issues with the training, there have been issues with the encryption. There have also been issues with some of the reporting, minor glitches that they have fixed as they've gone along.One of the things they can improve on a little bit is the usability side, to make some things simpler... The tool does have a lot of knobs, you can turn a lot of things on and off and you can change things. Sometimes, it can become a little overwhelming. They should remove some confirmation options and make it simpler for the less mature customers and people who are still trying to grasp it.We have a lot of users who, because they're engineers and they're bringing down product data - where, at times, a top-level product could be 10,000 or 15,000 objects - it's difficult for us to determine what should be a concern and what shouldn't be a concern. We work with the Securonix folks to try to come up with better ways to identify that.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect.With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time.If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it.Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low.

Read more »

We have an annual license. We pay $200,000 for the base licensing and we pay another $50,000 for the software as a service.We have a license from our 5.0, so that license just continued. We paid them the extra cloud-hosting costs for a year which were about $300,000.We went in on a three-year agreement which has an annual licensing fee, based upon the number of people that we're monitoring. There have not been any additional costs to the standard licensing fees.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Activity Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
Views
46,170
Comparisons
15,734
Reviews
53
Average Words per Review
563
Avg. Rating
8.9
2nd
Views
6,729
Comparisons
3,104
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
2,321
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerSecuronix
Learn
CyberArk
Securonix Solutions
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

SNYPR is a next-generation security analytics platform that transforms big data into actionable security intelligence. Built on a Hadoop big data security lake, SNYPR combines an open data model, log management, security incident and event management (SIEM), user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) and fraud detection into a complete, end-to-end platform that can be deployed in its entirety or in flexible, modular components.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Securonix Security Analytics
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationDtex SystemsPfizerWestern UnionHarrisITG
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company10%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm33%
Retailer15%
Comms Service Provider11%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise76%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Securonix Security Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
353,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email