Compare CyberArk PAS vs. WALLIX BASTION

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 53 reviews while WALLIX BASTION is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management with 1 review. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while WALLIX BASTION is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WALLIX BASTION writes "A solution with a simple interface and a strong access manager that's easy to install". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas WALLIX BASTION is most compared with CyberArk PAS, Fudo PAM and ManageEngine Password Manager Pro.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk PAS Logo
30,366 views|15,822 comparisons
WALLIX BASTION Logo
431 views|342 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Use WALLIX BASTION? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, ARCON, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: September 2019.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability.This solution is quite stable.The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out.I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature.

Read more »

The interface is very simple. It doesn't need any plug-ins, just browsers that are installed at the beginning.

Read more »

Cons
Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.Make it easier to deploy.I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution.There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar.If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature.Tech support staff can be more proactive.

Read more »

The product doesn't have behavior analytics. They promised to develop this, but only for the cloud, not for on-premise versions.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect.With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time.If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it.Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
30,366
Comparisons
15,822
Reviews
51
Average Words per Review
571
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
431
Comparisons
342
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
568
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 69% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerBASTION
Learn
CyberArk
WALLIX
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

WALLIX offers cybersecurity and privileged access management solutions that secure and protect your most critical IT assets.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about WALLIX BASTION
Sample Customers
Rockwell Automation
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company25%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider11%
Retailer8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise79%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, ARCON, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: September 2019.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email