Compare CyberArk PAS vs. WSO2 Identity Server
CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Access Management with 53 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 9th in Access Management with 2 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "A stable solution for single sign-on and role-based permissions". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with OpenIAM, ForgeRock and SailPoint IdentityIQ. See our CyberArk PAS vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2019. 371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task. For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks. There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product. We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant. We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability. This solution is quite stable. The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out. I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature. | I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten. Comprehensive ecosystem. |
Cons | |
Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use. Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server. The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it. Make it easier to deploy. I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution. There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar. If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature. Tech support staff can be more proactive. | The high availability architecture has to be improved. I found the initial setup to be very complex. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product. This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today. I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product. No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product. Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect. With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time. If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it. Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low. | We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs. 371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 30,366 Comparisons 15,822 Reviews 51 Average Words per Review 571 Avg. Rating 9.0 | Views 1,972 Comparisons 1,508 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 598 Avg. Rating 7.5 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. |  Compared 32% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager | |
Learn | |
| CyberArk | WSO2 |
Overview | |
CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution. | WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems. |
Offer | |
Learn more about CyberArk PAS | Learn more about WSO2 Identity Server |
Sample Customers | |
| Rockwell Automation | Nutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360 |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm28% Insurance Company15% Energy/Utilities Company10% Healthcare Company10% Software R&D Company25% Financial Services Firm16% Comms Service Provider10% Retailer8% | No Data Available |
Company Size | |
Small Business16% Midsize Enterprise11% Large Enterprise73% Small Business10% Midsize Enterprise12% Large Enterprise78% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also CyberArk PAS Reviews, WSO2 Identity Server Reviews, and our list of Best Access Management Companies.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 30000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign In.