We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fudo PAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have demoted a lot of domain admins and taken a lot of that away from people, giving it a shared account structure."
"You can write different types of policies for custom business needs or any developer needs. If they need certain functions allocated, they can be customized easily."
"Within the solution, I love the fact that everything is recorded. The configuration capabilities are great, too."
"I'm no longer the product owner for PAM, but I can say that the most useful feature is the vault functionality, which keeps all your passwords secure in a digital vault."
"The solution helps our developers access internal systems. It also helps us in Privilege Access Management."
"The regulation of accounts is by far the most needed and valuable part of the application."
"Automates password management to remove the human chain weakness."
"The password management feature is valuable."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"Over the past seven years, I have seen a lot of ups and downs with the product."
"There is room for improvement in the availability of custom connectors on the marketplace for this solution. Additionally, their services for the CICD pipeline and ease of integration could be improved."
"If there is an area that has room for improvement, it's probably working with their support and getting people on the phone. That is hard to do with most products in general, but that seems to be the difficult area. The product is fantastic, but sometimes we want somebody on the phone."
"Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."
"They need to provide better training for the System Integrator."
"I would like to see improvement in the custom connector for integration with different devices."
"CyberArk has a lot on the privileged access side but they have to concentrate more on the application side as well."
"Areas the product could be improved are in some of the reporting capabilities and how the reports are configured."
"The stability is not very good."
"The configuration is difficult."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard, ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport. See our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. Fudo PAM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.