Compare CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: May 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.""Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.""CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.""CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.""The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,""The technical support is good.""The most valuable feature is Special Monitoring.""The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task."

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pros »

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."

More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros »

Cons
"The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.""It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.""CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.""There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.""It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integration""We found a lot of errors during the initial setup. They should work to improve the implementation experience and to remove errors from the process.""The authentication port is available in CyberArk Alero but not Fortinet products.""Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Cons »

"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."

More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I believe that this solution is priced well. It's the market leader and I think that it's the best solution.""Overall, its pricing is really good. The main difference from all the other vendors is that they have one package that covers all the functionality and modules of the basic PAM, except the add-on modules like adware and server protection. It also doesn't include the licenses for domain controller protection or maybe an API call-related feature. For the basic privileged access management, the bundle pricing is really good, but when it comes to an agent-based solution for advanced cyber protection or application identity managers, it is expensive. Services are also very expensive if you hire the services team from CyberArk, but these guys are really good. For a couple of large banking projects, we had an experience with them. The banks wanted to have things quickly and efficiently, so we had to hire them. If we take four weeks, these guys can do everything on a weekend. They charge quite a big sum of money, but they know the system well.""The price of this solution is quite reasonable.""The solution is very expensive and requires a license. We pay for an enterprise license.""Pricing is quite high and it could be improved.""They have two types of licensing: purchase and subscription. You have to pay for each admin user, such as Microsoft admin, mail admin, database admin, etc."

More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Within the solution, I love the fact that everything is recorded. The configuration capabilities are great, too.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is quite reasonable.
Top Answer: Return on investment on over all product solution cost. especially hardware cost. when the licence increase due to jumpbox concept Hardware requirement also increase. secondly customisation duration… more »
Top Answer: The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives… more »
Top Answer: The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app.
Top Answer: For our new implementation, we're looking for an authentication server that provides: * Centralized and useful information * Identification * User passport * Connectivity with other hard token or soft… more »
Ranking
Views
37,460
Comparisons
19,201
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
644
Rating
8.2
12th
Views
368
Comparisons
281
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
500
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security
AccessMatrix Universal Access Management, i-Sprint Innovations AccessMatrix, AccessMatrix
Learn More
CyberArk
Video Not Available
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged access management and a global leader Identity Security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

AccessMatrix is a suite of integrated ICAM (Identity, Credential, Access Management and Versatile Authentication solutions) that enable organizations to effectively deploy versatile authentication, unified single sign-on, secure credential management services, flexible identity & role administration, externalized authorization, and provide comprehensive data analytics of access to important information assets.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Learn more about i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management
Sample Customers
Rockwell Automation
IRAS, Singapore Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Insurance Company15%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: May 2021.
512,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 15 reviews while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.2, while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "Good product with the flexibility to connect to any token". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Thycotic Secret Server, Azure Active Directory, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with IBM Security Access Manager and Entrust IdentityGuard.

See our list of .

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.