We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."Creating policies and the password rotation feature have been valuable. We don't have to memorize our password for the ADM account."
"Password rotation, session recording & isolation and on-demand privileges."
"The regulation of accounts is by far the most needed and valuable part of the application."
"I'm no longer the product owner for PAM, but I can say that the most useful feature is the vault functionality, which keeps all your passwords secure in a digital vault."
"CyberArk has allowed us to get the credentials and passwords out of hard-coded property files."
"It has helped from an auditing perspective identify who has access to privileged accounts."
"The solution is scalable."
"With PAM in place, we've experienced a significant reduction in potential security breaches."
"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."
"The product could be easier to use. More work needs to be done on this aspect; it is not good enough yet. It also takes up a lot of server space. Sometimes we need to use up to seven servers."
"I would like to see is the policy export and import. When we expend, we do not want to just hand do a policy."
"It should be easy to use for non-technical people. Its interface can be a bit difficult. Some parts of its interface are not very intuitive. Some of the controls are hidden, and instead of having a screen with all the controls for that account on it, you have to use menus and other similar things."
"They can do a better job in the PSM space."
"It can be made user-friendly, in the sense of the console is pretty outdated."
"Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support."
"It's hard to find competent resellers/support."
"Tech support staff can be more proactive."
"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is ranked 11th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management writes "Enhanced security and simplified management offering a centralized solution with granular settings". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is most compared with Delinea Privileged Access Service and Delinea Secret Server.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.