We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Oracle Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."On the customer accounts side, our account managers are responsive. If you ask them, they will get you whomever you need."
"It is one of the best solutions in the market. Ever since I started using this solution, there has not been any compromise when it comes to our lab."
"Increased our insight into how privileged accounts are being used and distributed within our footprint."
"I find value in notifications from CyberArk when passwords fail verification and have other issues."
"Its' quite stable."
"The technical support is good."
"You can easily manage more than 4000 accounts with one PSM."
"I found it valuable that CyberArk Privileged Access Manager can be integrated with PTA (privileged threat analytics), and this means that it will tell you if there's a risk to the logins and signs of risk and if risky behavior is observed. It's a good feature. Another good feature is the CPM (central password manager) because it helps you rotate the passwords automatically without involving the admins. It can go and update the scheduled tasks and the services. At the same time, if there's an application where it cannot do all of these, CPM will trigger an automatic email to the application owners, telling them that they should go ahead and change the password. This allows you to manage the account password that CyberArk cannot manage, which helps mitigate the risk of old passwords, where the password gets compromised, and also allows you to manage the security of the domain."
"The product supports customization."
"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."
"In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively."
"My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on."
"The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."
"The current user interface is a little dated. However, I hear there are changes coming in the next version."
"The lead product has a slow process. There are some reports and requirements from CyberArk which are not readily available as an applicable solution. We have made consistent management requests in the logs."
"There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"The authentication port is available in CyberArk Alero but not Fortinet products."
"One thing that could be improved is to create of a better alternative for fixing group policy fees. We currently use Microsoft, but they have introduced new policies that may not be compatible."
"CyberArk PAM could greatly benefit from an under-the-hood update; integrating machine learning algorithms could provide predictive insights."
"CyberArk has a lot on the privileged access side but they have to concentrate more on the application side as well."
"The technical support is not very good at all."
"There are problems with stability."
"Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again."
"The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface."
"The solution's lifecycle management is troublesome. Also, another area of issue in the solution is the part involving documentation of certain features."
"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."
"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 10th in Access Management with 15 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "A convenient solution that supports customization and provides many features in a single suite". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and PingID. See our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs. Oracle Access Manager report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.